Jul 20, 2017 · 1 min read
The article says this bill would “expand existing laws that limit…”. So the issue with this writer and the ACLU is not free speech or he would have an issue with the existing laws. It is the fact that Israel is the beneficiary of the legislation. The existing laws already limit free speech according to the definition in this article. So why the sudden uproar.
This bill is, in a way, a version of the same laws that kept got the baker and photographer sued and fined by the homosexual couples. I didn’t see the ACLU rally to their side. Pic and choose your discrimination ACLU. At least you are consistently proving that you are a left wing organization.
