Don’t standardise on Basecamp, Trello, Holacracy or any other system. Here’s the alternative.
Tom Nixon

Helpful words Tom, and much I agree with.

I suppose the experiences we see with holacracy are largely on someone at the top saying (honourably, I’m sure) “I don’t want to be a controlling dictator type of lead, however benevolent I might be, so let’s do holacracy please.” It’s an imposition still, of course it is. It is a direction. It’s inflicted freedom.

Yet, if the people in an organisation can collectively agree to launch into a holacracy form of self-management, then there’s an understanding they will be working in that “heavily” prescribed way, perhaps is in order to keep them from falling back into less-inclusive hierarchical ways.

Anyway, there’s a lot to think about with any form of alternative way of running things — sometimes, someone has to be the catalyst to something new and that often is a senior figure in an organisation.

I suppose in conclusion, we — as people — tend to be a lot more behind things we feel we’ve some influence, input and inclusion on.

ANYTHING imposed will have a much lower energising, commitment-creating, compliance-inducing impact on people.

Yet we see it all the time still: top-down imposed change; systemic rollout of management training with little or no consultation; and initiative after initiative with cliched posters of rowers and “we’re all in this together let’s hit that target” rhetoric.

And finally, you helped me come to this conclusion: 
It seems that those who practice the
least diversity of thought and approach, are those most critical of others who do.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.