Innovations in Microfiltration Unlock Higher Performance and

Lower Costs in RO-based Wastewater Recycling Systems

By Tom Belmont, CEO of Process and Water

Introduction

As the pressure on fresh water supplies continues to grow worldwide, industries and municipalities are experiencing the negative effects. These include more frequent water supply shortages, limits on the capacity of municipal wastewater treatment plants, and escalating costs for water and effluent treatment. One of the most promising strategies for offsetting some of these impacts involves the use of advanced membrane technologies.

This paper discusses some of the technical aspects of these advances, and how membrane technologies are increasing the efficiency and reliability of industrial wastewater recycle systems while also lowering their operating costs.

Wastewater Recycle Challenges

Among the various recycling alternatives, much of membrane development over the past several years has centered on reverse osmosis (RO), which functions to separate most, if not all, substances in wastewater. RO is a more cost-effective technique for handling wastewater with high total dissolved solids (TDS) than other treatment alternatives. But one issue has caused persistent operational issues for RO systems. That issue is membrane fouling.

Extensive research has been done to determine the factors that affect membrane fouling. These factors include ionic composition, salt concentration, and the presence of organic components, and suspended solids and colloids. Various applications have been studied for the handling of ground water, surface water and sea water. But very little has been done to examine membrane fouling with the complex and constantly changing chemical mixtures in industrial wastewater flows.

Despite their critical capability to produce re-usable water, many large RO-based recycling installations have experienced difficult operational problems in the field. The most common problems include unreliable filtration production, decrease in salt rejection, the need for frequent membrane cleaning, and premature membrane failure. Each of these issues contributes to higher operating costs and lower long-term effectiveness. In some cases, the problems were significant enough to cause shutdowns at water recycle plants.

The primary cause of this performance degradation and failure is that RO membranes generally have low tolerances for a broad range of incompatible components in water. These substances, if not removed prior to the RO phase of the process, will cause scaling, fouling or permanent degradation of the RO membrane. Recognizing this problem, and to avoid its ramifications, suppliers of reverse osmosis membranes suppliers have established feed water quality criteria for RO systems. While these criteria are helpful, they do not prevent incompatible elements from finding their way into feed water flows. When they do, and feed water quality falls out of specified ranges, the industrial customer winds up owning the problem.

The ever-increasing demand for higher-quality, lower-cost industrial wastewater recycle options has paved the way for innovations with RO. One area in which newer membrane technologies are driving significant performance improvements and cost reduction is microfiltration (MF) pre-treatment for RO systems. Because of its versatility, robust nature and high filtrate quality, tubular microfiltration is well on the way to replacing the more traditional equipment used to remove unacceptable substances in the RO pretreatment process. These include gravity clarifiers, media filters, lime softeners and ion exchangers.

One key characteristic of MF is that many agents that are incompatible for RO can be converted into microfiltration-compatible material and efficiently removed prior to the RO phase. MF and RO can work effectively in tandem, but only if the system is designed to properly support the necessary chemical reactions.

Chemical Reaction Development

Based on the types and quantities of fouling substances identified in the wastewater, a chemical treatment process is developed to counteract each of the fouling factors. The array of chemical treatment options includes precipitation, adsorption, chemical reduction, pH adjustment and microbial control. When several fouling agents are present, the chemistries for dealing with each substance are evaluated for their compatibility and combined effect. Treatment processes are usually carried out in two- or three-phased chemical reactions. The chemical treatment typically includes some combination of the following processes:

  • Lime softening — — Hardness precipitation for scaling c
  • Magnesium hydroxide — Silica colloid adsorption for fouling prevention.
  • Dithiocarbamate — Heavy metal precipitation and bio-growth control.
  • Powdered activated carbon — Organic reduction, oxidant destruction and bio- film prevention
  • Fe/Al coagulation — Precipitates and colloid agglomeration for membrane filtration enhancement
  • pH Adjustment — pH operating zone optimization for the integrated reactions

How the Membrane MF Process Works

After the chemical reactions are completed, the pretreated wastewater is processed through MF membrane filters that are designed to separate the incompatible precipitates from the water. The wastewater is pumped at a high velocity (12–15 feet per second) through membrane modules such as those shown in Figure 1. These modules are connected in a series, with inlet pressures that are typically around 45–50 psig. This creates a turbulent flow of water that moves parallel to the membranes surfaces. This pressurized, turbulent flow produces a high-shear scrubbing action which minimizes deposits of solids on the membranes’ surfaces.

During operation, clear filtrate water permeates through the membrane, while suspended solids are retained in the re-circulation loop, and then purged for further de- watering. The membranes are automatically cleaned in two ways. First, they are cleaned with chemicals when the flux drops to below the specified design level. Second, these systems have automatic back-pulse mechanisms that provide physical surface cleaning by periodically reversing the direction of the filtrate flow. These automated cleaning functions are key components in the design of these systems and critically important to their reliability and long-term performance.

The Next Generation of MF Membranes

One of the biggest challenges for MF manufacturers is in the application and control of the pore forming technique in the membrane production process. A recognized and well-documented problem for many MF products is their tendency to bleed fine particles through their membranes until the larger pores are plugged by the solids. This issue usually occurs after the chemical cleaning or back-pulse processes, and results in premature flow decline, low-flux operation and out-of-spec performance.

Microfilter systems produced by Process and Water are designed to overcome this problem. The designs were developed after extensive R&D, QA control and field testing, and in collaboration by Duraflow, Process and Water’s membrane supply partner, these modules effectively eliminate operational problems related to pore formation.

Process and Water’s MF (Microfilter) offerings are manufactured in a tubular configuration capable of handling high concentrations of solids. The fabrication process starts with preparation of a solution containing specialized polymers and other chemicals that enhance membrane formation. The fabrication process involves precision application of the solution to the porous, polymeric tubes in a highly controlled environment. Through a proprietary, pore-forming process, micro-porous membrane are formed on the inside surface of the support tubes. This results in very narrow pore distribution throughout the membranes. In fact, more than 99% of the pores in the MF modules are less than 0.2 microns in diameter.

The specialized solution and application procedures effectively eliminate all of the unwanted large pores in membranes. This allows the near-total removal of unacceptable components for more consistent adherence to feed water quality criteria. The manufacturing process also results in membranes with much higher numbers of pores per square inch of surface area. This enables the membranes in Process and Water MF systems to operate consistently at twice the operating flux of other MF systems. In addition, this feature means that these Process and Water systems require roughly half as many membranes to filter the same amount of water as other such systems. Lastly, the manufacturing process forms a very strong chemical bond between the membranes themselves and polymeric tube surfaces. This produces a highly durable MF filter material that can extend a continuous operation for 5 to 10 years without membrane replacement.

Reverse Osmosis Process

Pretreated wastewater in these systems is typically pressured between 200 to 600 psig and processed through thin-film composite or cellulose acetate RO membranes. The feed stream is separated into permeate (clean water) usually 75 to 80 % of the feed (recovery), and concentrated brine containing the separated salts (reject). The permeate water generated by these systems is cleaner and less conductive than that of most municipal water supplies. That said, the nature of customers’ specific wastewater requirements, and their objectives for recycling and reuse, must be the primary factors that drive the system design, chemical reactions, and membrane configurations for their RO systems.

MF — RO Installations

A large number of installations have successfully combined proper chemical reaction with Process and Water’s high-flux, tubular microfiltration and RO systems for recycling of wastewater from various industries (Figure 2). Following are examples of selected installations.

  • Anodizing — A major Aerospace supplier Universal Alloys manufacturer in Romania, operates a 45 GPM MF/RO system for removal of anodizing wastewater and 95% recycle of combined wastewater.
  • Electroplating — A large job shop in New York operates a 40 GPM MF/RO system for removal of heavy metals and 65% recycle of combined wastewater.
  • Consumer electronics — An electronic connector manufacturer in operates a 30 GPM MF/RO system for removal of heavy metals and 70% recycle of combined wastewater.
  • Power generation– A power plant in California operates a 500 GPM MF/RO/EVAP system for removal of hardness/silica and 100% recycle of cooling tower blow-

Conclusion

Microfiltration, when coupled with an appropriate chemical pretreatment can provide a cost-effective, high-performance method for pretreatment of industrial wastewater RO systems. Compared to conventional wastewater treatment operations, MF systems have smaller footprints and lower operating costs. In addition, high quality and consistent filtrate produced by modern MF systems leads to improved overall performance of the RO system. As has been proven true in the field, a well-protected RO membrane can be operated effectively for several years before replacement is required.

Against the backdrop of today’s global water supply issues, companies across all industry segments are realize that it makes good business sense to become more self-sufficient through the recycling of the water resources they use to support their production processes. Whatever the industry or the specific requirement, Process and Water is ready to help customers meet their production water challenges with MF-RO systems that are among the most innovative in the industry.

About the Author

Process and Water is a leading provider of innovative water purification, wastewater treatment and regulatory compliance solutions for customers in the commercial and industrial sectors. As CEO, he sets the Company’s strategic direction and oversees all aspects of its operations, including the design, manufacture, and delivery of solutions built with cutting-edge fluid handling and process purification technologies.

from Our Water Purification Blog http://bit.ly/1nNnV65
 via Process and Water

Originally published on Tumblr

Show your support

Clapping shows how much you appreciated Process and Water’s story.