Am laughing now at your tone, and my room mate is asking me whats up not that what you said is funny or i find any humorous inference from your sarcastic writeup.
Thinking if to or not to respond to you, but if i do like i did earlier, i would have to pick some real premises to counter in your argument not all of it.
I said "whatever" to make you understand that am indifferent to all of the body of works you took an enigmatic part of your time to write but what am concerned about is the second inference Ezinne’s article is arguing from, which is that Mc(whatever (because i feel he is not important enough for me to remember his name)) ridiculed Serena Williams ability to be the ‘World Best Tennis Player’ (not even for a minute) because she is a woman (i didn’t write black woman). You agree with him which makes me respect you less and whatever argument you bring to support this will also make it diminish more.
Let the argument be based on metrics like you first mentioned not on the innocuous fallacy that ‘Men are better than Women’. I participated in debates of such nature when in Secondary school (high school), so am uninterested. Just tell me what metrics you’ll use to judge a World Best Tennis (irrespective of gender), and am sure you will be cynical enough to include strength, size, speed or genitals.
This time am not angry…..
