And I have trouble taking seriously a critique that contains its own criticism of other’s content. ‘I know you are but what am I’ isn’t a great argument if you’re trying to prove Milo’s followers aren’t childish. But doubling down with the charge of obliviousness while saying both Milo is a “provocateur” and yet somehow Milo still “cares what his insults mean” in the span of four sentences is just bad writing.