Robot Surgeons That Care Enough to Make Healthcare More Efficient… and Not Take Your Jobs…

By Vin Sharma📚🎥📸📻💻

Talk of societies transforming to coexist with Robots in the not-too-distant future has led many to speculate whether jobs could also be lost as a result. But a team of researchers who have been looking at the impact interactive robotics can have on the healthcare industries argues they will simply make jobs more efficient.

The research project conducted by an international team of ‘Roboticist’ experts and led by Dr Elena De Momi of the Politecnico di Milano in Italy, has successfully developed and trained a robot to imitate a range of natural human actions.

De Momi’s project indicates that humans and robots will effectively coordinate their actions for a number of healthcare purposes such as the role of Nursing in hospitals as well as also being able to adapt robotic engineering in order to undertake complex medical procedures such as surgeries too.

Dr Momi explained some of the findings of the project with @vinsharma:

“Robots can provide assistance in several professional activities in which the robots would not replace human jobs but simply act as a co-worker or assistant. This is what happens in industrial settings, such as in the automotive manufacturing process in factories where the robot and human can cooperatively work on a common task.” she explained.

According to the published study, the use of robot surgeons in hospitals would in fact lead to major improvements in safety during surgeries because unlike their human counterparts, robots would not tire and will be able to complete an endless series of precise movements without the need for any rest.

Already we are also seeing the advanced use of robotic exoskeletons to enable paralyzed people to walk, as well as rehabilitation of stroke or spinal cord injury patients. This is also showing early indications of how robots will be a very accepted presence in a range of healthcare environments.

The vision of robots conducting complex medical procedures brings about fears around likely ‘robot errors’ and in such cases, who would be accountable? The robot or the human? Dr Elena De Momi told @vinsharma:

“Robo-ethics is a natural question to ask. Think about the policies that Google cars are adopting in cases of their risk evaluations and rule definitions. In the case of surgical robots, it depends whether the system is autonomous or tele-operated by a human. In the latter case the error can be of the surgeon, but in the first case and in cases such as system failures for example, the responsibility is of the manufacturer, which should also guarantee top maintenance just as elevator companies do currently.”

Meanwhile Japanese scientists are also responding to their country now having one of the biggest elderly populations in the world, as well as its very low birthrates.

Future tech caretakers replacing family members as may have once only been imagined in science fiction films and cartoons could be in place in Japanese society by as early as 2020 according to reports.

Toyota’s ‘Partner Robot Family’ project has already developed working models for the care industry as well as for general domestic housekeeping duties similar to the fictional robot nanny and housekeeper in ‘The Jetsons’ cartoon series.

And Honda’s commercial rival to Toyota’s humanoid developments is a robot called ASIMO that can impressively take on a range of human-like tasks and with precision and accuracy.

According to Dr Elana De Momi’s robotics study in Europe, the overall goal remains to complement human expertise with the skills and benefits of a robot and not replace it completely. But in a world where big corporations are always seeking ways in which to improve tasks whilst also reducing overall costs; the advantages of fewer robots required to do the job of many humans may risk being seen as efficient in more ways than one.

Responding to Professor Stephen Hawking’s previous ‘doom’ premonitions of sentinel robots being able to retaliate against their human allies, Dr Momi provided a rather cynical response:

“I don’t believe in catastrophic scenarios. Unless robots are programmed by humans to damage humankind, they are just our assistants. I do however agree with Stephen Hawking’s statement that robotic technologies can increase the social inequalities ‘if the machine-owners successfully lobby against wealth redistribution” she told @vinsharma.