A single line of what could be considered clean code now raises a new question — should it be refactored to 9 lines to please the compiler? (see the nil coalescing operator example further down) What is more important? Concise code or compiler friendly code? Well, it depends on project size and developer frustration.
But wait… There is an Xcode plugin for that
Before getting to some examples, let me first mention that going through log files manually is very time consuming. Someone came up with a terminal command to make it easier but I took it a step further and threw together an Xcode plugin.
In my case, the initial aim was to just identify and fix the most time consuming areas but I’m now of the opinion that it has to become more of an iterative process. That way I can, other than making the code build more efficiently, also guard against time consuming functions entering the project in first place.
More than a few surprises
I frequently jump back and forth various Git branches and waiting for a slow project to compile tends to end up wasting a lot of time. I’ve been wondering for quite some time why a pet project of mine (roughly 20k lines of Swift code) builds as slowly as it does.
After having learnt what really caused it, I must admit I am really quite surprised to see single lines of code requiring several seconds to compile.
Let’s have a look at a few examples.
Nil Coalescing Operator
The compiler certainly didn’t like the first approach here. After unwrapping the two views, the build time was reduced by 99.4%.
ArrayOfStuff + [Stuff]
This one goes something like this:
return ArrayOfStuff + [Stuff]
// rather than
I do this fairly regularly and it has an impact on the required build time every time. The below was the worst one and the build time reduction here was 97.9%.
By doing nothing more than replacing the ternary operator with an if else statement, the build time was reduced by 92.9%. If map is replaced with a for loop, it will drop another 75% (but then my eyes would hurt). 😉
Casting CGFloat to CGFloat
Not sure what I was thinking here. The values were already CGFloat and some parentheses were redundant. After cleaning up the mess, the build time dropped by 99.9%.
This is a really odd one. The below example variables are a mix of local and instance variables. The problem is likely not the rounding itself but a combination of code in the method. Removing the rounding did a massive difference though, 97.6% to be precise.
// Build time: 1433.7ms
let expansion = a — b — c + round(d * 0.66) + e// Build time: 34.7ms
let expansion = a — b — c + d * 0.66 + e
Note: All measures where made on a MacBook Air (13-inch, Mid 2013).
Try it out
Whether or not you have a problem with slow build times, it is still useful to build an understanding of what confuses the compiler. I’m sure you’ll find a few surprises yourself. As a reference, here is the full code for the one requiring 5+ seconds to compile in my project.
Update: I have written a second part to this post which you will find here.