I wrote a really long reply that my browser then decided to delete -_- In summary a good way to explain my position is by looking at the difference between consensus and majority rule: http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/politics/difference-between-consensus-and-majority-rule/

the main issue with the hard fork at hand is that it has an uneven material impact on the different stakeholders in the system, which means that it should be cryptoeconomically impossible to reach consensus.

The PoS change is a good example of consensus based decision making — even miners agree to it — and this is because it was made early and debated with patience until there was no skepticism or opposition left, allowing every stakeholder to adjust their own behaviour in such a way they wouldn’t materially lose out (most obvious example is miners adjusting how much to invest in their equipment).

Compare that to the current campaign which instead of focusing on debate, has focused on drowning out, attacking and ridiculing the opposing side, creating a political rift in the community and setting the stage for future drama.