In Defense of Trump: the importance of “cutting to the chase”

SVIR
SVIR
Aug 26, 2017 · 3 min read

[NOTE: this is exercise in taking the opposite side of what I believe. Important thing to do once in a while]

“bullshit is speech intended to persuade (a.k.a. rhetoric), without regard for truth. The liar cares about the truth and attempts to hide it; the bullshitter doesn’t care if what they say is true or false, but rather only cares whether or not their listener is persuaded.”

Basically, Trump has figured out what every person should be really taught a very young age. It’s a tough lesson, but it’s the right one: there is no loyalty, everyone is in it for themselves, you give people what they want they are happy, if they are unhappy they start throwing whatever pejorative or power they have to get back to happy.

In this case, HRC and her cronies tried to turn their loss into a “police matter” (DOJ, Mueller, #TrumpRussia). There is no collusion and power is a usually a winner. Collusion and Obstruction are out the door. He is now literally proving out the point that McConnell’s only leverage is a legislative agenda. However, no one expects Congress to help pay the rent so McConnell has nothing to offer that Trump needs. He’s got his base, can throw everyone else under the bus, as long as he stays focused on the media as the scapegoat.

The wall is infrastructure spending and there is no way to really get around the “shut down the government or give me the wall” stance especially given that Joe the Plumber is literally rolling his eyes at Jane the “feminist wife” who works at non profits while taking money from corporate “husbands” that has taken over the Democratic party.

Trump’s business model is rather simple. Twitter does his PR — the “winners” in SF all work for Trump. He doesn’t need to pass any bills to win in 2020, no one has faith in DC, and it literally proves the point that DC doesn’t work if obstruction works.

Voters will probably ask in 2020: who will get it done instead? Trump has to focus on embarrassing (“drawing the contrast”) Kamala Harris by letting “Kamala be Kamala” (a mean girl from high school who banged Willie Brown to get ahead, got smacked around for shady DNA evidence practices, and can’t answer a straight question with a straight answer). Oh I know, “a woman…”

What are the other female Senators going to do (and it’s going to a female Senator on the top of the D ticket in 2020 because like with Carmela’s spec house, rich dudes give their wives political donations so they’ll stop nagging him and go nag a politician instead)? Elizabeth Warren (the schoolmarmy anti Wall Street crusader who took hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Harvard Endowment to teach one class): does she seem like a leader? Kirsten Gillibrand the shady tobacco lawyer who won’t even put her professional experience in her bio?

America will only be great again with a true Vozdh at the top.

#MAGA.

Every single moral argument against Trump also applies to Democrats, literally. Name one that doesn’t. Racism? Being rude? Being totally inappropriate to women?

)
SVIR

Written by

SVIR

Tell me something I can't find out from the Internet. Signal (always off the record).

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade