Ree, if you’re going to write something about my intelligence, back it up with a ‘why’ please. What did I say that was incorrect. I understand that Donald Trump attended UPenn and while there majored in economics, which was part of Wharton. But if anyone is claiming that saying you attended Wharton does not imply you received an MBA from Wharton Business School is either ignorant or lying to suit their political beliefs. When people ask you where you went to undergraduate, which is all Donald Trump did, it’s common convention to name the University you attended, not the individual school that contained your undergraduate major. By Trumps logic, I studied computer science because one of my classes fell under under the Computer science school. I also studied psychology because I took psych 101. Also, I have a degree in astronomy because I took another 100 level course in that. I could go on and on with schools I “attended” but it’d make no sense because it’s ridiculous to say I attended the School of Earth and Space Exploration, because I took astronomy 101. Oh, look at me, I’m a fucking astronaut because I took an astronomy class my freshman year. Yet Trump only mentions Wharton, not UPenn, because he wants people to think he has a more advanced degree than he does.

In the original response that I responded to, the author said the students have willfully and purposefully ignored Hillary Clinton’s problems, legal trouble, lies, criminal acts or whatever you want to say about her. But she doesn’t go around using the name of their college as a reason she should be president, as Trump does. So the students didn’t mention Clinton, nor did they endorse her. How do you know some of these students won’t vote for the Green party, or the communist party? There are plenty of other people on the ballot. But hey, they probably won’t do that and they probably will vote for Clinton, because they don’t want to see the value of their education continue to be diminished by the president of the United States.

Under normal circumstances having a president be an alumnus of your school would be a great selling point. What does this say about this man that these students want no part of this one particular alumnus? Not to mention that, as this is a business school, I’d have to figure a not insignificant portion of the students who signed the letter are republican, but I can’t say that for sure. The fact remains it’s a very rare move for a school’s students and faculty to make.

So Ree, tell me, in you’re fucked-up pro-Trump head where I went wrong. Don’t just question my intelligence and back it up with nothing. Can you not string enough words together to build a proper defense of calling me stupid? Are you unable to explain in writing what specific part of my response makes me stupid? Can you not put together a reasonable defense of your beliefs and views and why you believe what you believe? If you’re just going to write “HAHA” because I called a letter that’s purpose is to distance the the students of a school from an alumnus, not political in nature, then maybe put a little more thought into a response before you make one. Because, do you know what’s stupid? Being accusatory without being able to articulate a reasonable explanation of why you are accusing a person of having a certain negative attribute, such as being stupid or lacking intelligence. You know, that actually reminds me of someone I’ve seen a lot of recently. Who is that person who continually deflects criticism by claiming his opponents possess the attributes that he clearly possesses? Oh fuck, that’s Donald Trump. Someone calls him stupid, the next day that person is stupid. Someone says he has small hands, the next day, Hillary has small hands. Ree is stupid, so I am stupid. I get it now.

Ree, I welcome any discussion you might want to have, but this will be the last time I respond to the remarks of an asshole. which, until you can properly prove otherwise, you have shown yourself to be.