I see the British arrogance rears its ugly head once again.
oncefallendotcom
31

Go away — you are pedantic, uninformed and becoming boring. I am not here to educate you.

As for your puerile explanation, it means nothing. Sure, paedophilia in psych or research can describe a condition, much as speeding can have nothing to do with traffic law. In a courtroom both can and do have a very different meaning. Learn the difference between a paedophilic act and a psychological aberration.

Please try to get a few clues. For a start — I am not British, nor am I in Great Britain.

You are very good at making sweeping generalisations, leaping to conclusions, and the enthusiastic pedantic splitting of hairs, but not very observant, nor very good at research. So far all you have done is attempt to argue semantics and attempt to apply your opinion regarding your local law to another country’s law.

The issue is that child prostitution exists — it doesn’t matter a damn how the offences are described under US federal or state law. It is is a real problem regardless of how you try to dismiss it with offensive and nonsensical comments about the “Victim Industry”. You are an obnoxious Twat and have added nothing to, nor have you provided valid argument against the OP’s post. You clearly have neither concern nor awareness of the problem. Only a simple minded fool would try to pretend that child prostitution is not a very real and very abhorrent problem — as you are attempting to do.

As an aside to prostitution, look at other areas of child sexual abuse. Do some research about “Bible Belt Pastors” and child sex. The number of them facing charges is astounding. Let’s see you describe them as figments of the Victim Industry’s imagination.