Brown: Mayor De Blasio’s Shameful Claim That NYC Students Only Perform Well Thanks to Test Prep
By Campbell Brown
I n going out of his way to tear down the exceptional test results of New York City’s public charter school students, Mayor Bill de Blasio showed once more his inability to tell the difference between shooting himself in the foot and sprinting.
And that he shouldn’t be the first to cast stones.
No doubt the teachers union and its anti-charter supporters were pleased by the mayor’s assertion that “some substantial piece” of the performance of these students — most of them disadvantaged — “is based on charters that focus on test prep.”
Just as when Schools Chancellor Carmen Farina offhandedly claimed that charters evict low-performing students as testing dates draw near, de Blasio advances an evidence-free argument that is likely rooted in low expectations about what poor children can accomplish. His unearned certainty reflects a mindset that has crippled urban education for decades.
It does so in part by disparaging claims of achievement. Charter schools nearly doubled the ELA proficiency gains of traditional schools (13.7 percent compared to 7.6 percent)? Charters outperformed the state by ten points in math? A vastly disproportionate number of New York’s highest performers are charters?
De Blasio believes anyone can do this — if they test prep.
(Related: New poll shows that more than half of NYC parents would prefer to send their kid to a public charter school)
“If that’s where they put a lot of their time and energy, of course it could yield better test scores,” he explained. “But we don’t think that’s good educational policy. So we’re going to do it the way that we believe is right for our children.”
By his logic, lower scores are more authentic, evidence that traditional schools are pursuing “broader education.” Test prep “is just not the philosophy of this administration and of DOE.”
Perhaps not, but it is embedded in school culture. To be sure, Chancellor Carmen Farina has pushed against devoting excessive time to prep. But she has also told principals that “test preparation in moderation is fine.”
She speaks from experience. As principal of PS 6, the affluent Upper East Side elementary school, she was known for conducting “intense test preparation” for the month before exams, according to a 2004 New York Sun report.
“They had these math workbooks that they were working out of,” one parent recalled. “Math class would be spent doing worksheets that were specifically designed for the tests and they would have some homework too.”
When school scores slid a bit after Farina’s departure, parents attributed it to the fact that the new principal was “more laid-back and place[d] less emphasis on test prep,” according to the Sun.
A decade later, the New York Times found that extensive prepping persisted throughout the city despite efforts to reduce it. “Many students and parents are actually clamoring for it,” the Times reported; the article also cited a union survey that found 25 percent of k-8 teachers saying they spent more than five hours a week on test prep.
The possibility of meaningful school improvement seems depressingly unlikely under the watch of a mayor who believes that charter students perform well only through the artifice of test prep and that when you “actually teach” kids they will score poorly.
Originally published at www.the74million.org.