A Copy Of That NY Times Op-Ed

TheAngelAtHeist
8 min readSep 7, 2018

--

A Copy Of That Op-ed from within the pages of the American Press. & possible alternate thesaurus meanings .

President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.

President Trump is creating a challenge to his presidency unlike any created by a modern United States leader.

It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.

It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the United States is furiously disunited over Mr Trump’s conduction. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition unwavering on his degeneracy.

The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

The puzzle — which he does not fully comprehend — is that many of the leading executive in his own administration are working studiously from within to neutralize parts of his program and his worst idiosyncrasy’s.

I would know. I am one of them.

I would know. I am one of them.

To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.

To be clear, ours is not the fashionable “intransigence” of the godforsaken. We want the agency to triumph and think that many of its protocols have already made the States safer and more affluent.

But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.

And we believe our first duty is to this Nation, and the president continues to behave in a tone that is prejudicial to the well-being of our dominion.

That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.

That is why many Trump representatives have sworn to do what we can to shield our autonomous establishments while circumventing Mr. Trump’s more erroneous spontaneity’s until he is out of responsibility.

The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.

The crux of the problem is the president’s probity. Anyone who works with him knows he is not tethered to any perceivable first principles that guide his adjudicature.

Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.

Much as he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little compatibility for values long championed by traditionalists: free thought, free exchanges and free society. At best he has evoked these ideals in orchestrated settings. At worst, he has besieged them outright.

In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.

In extension to his mass-marketing of the opinion that the media is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s inclinations are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.

Don’t get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more.

Understand. There are radiant spots that the near ceaseless negative coverage of the administration manages to ignore: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more.

But these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.

And these accomplishments have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, uncooperative, frivolous and incompetent.

From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.

From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will clandestinely admit their daily incredulity at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to seclude their enterprise from his conceit.

Meetings with him drift off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive diatribe, and his impulsiveness results in ill-conceived, unknowledgeable and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.

Gatherings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally careless decisions that have to be unperformed.

“There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,” a top official complained to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.

“There is indisputably no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,” a top official bellyached to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office gathering at which the president reneged on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.

The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.

The erratic behaviour would be more concerning if it weren’t for unacknowledged individuals in and around the White House. Some of his supporters have been cast as criminals by the media. though confidentially, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad resolutions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always fruitful.

It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.

It may be cold comfort in this turbulent era, but Citizens should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognise what is proceeding, And we are trying to do what’s appropriate even when Donald Trump will not.

The result is a two-track presidency.

The result is a two-track presidency.

Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.

Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a predilection for tyrants and despots, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and exhibits little palpable appreciation for the confines that bind us to connected, harmonious community.

Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather than ridiculed as rivals.

Discerning observers have recognised, though, that the rest of the legislature is running on another path, one where Nations like Russia are called out for interference and penalised accordingly, and where collaborators around the world are committed as associates rather than lampooned as contendors.

On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.

On Russia, for example, the president was unenthusiastic to remove so many of Mr. Putin’s agents as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about leading staff members letting him get boxed into further showdowns with Russia, and he conveyed dissatisfaction that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malevolent actions. But his national security unit knew better — such behaviours had to be taken, to hold Moscow answerable.

This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.

This isn’t the endeavour of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.

Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.

Given the volatility many observed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for ousting the president. But no one wanted to trigger a constitutional catastrophe. So we will do what we can to shepherd the administration in the appropriate direction until — one way or another — it’s over.

The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility.

The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our conversation to be deprived of civility.

Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.

Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.

We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue. Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them.

We may no longer have Senator McCain. And we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honour to public life and our national dialogue. Mr Trump may fear such honourable men, and we should revere them.

There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one: Americans.

There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. And the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed labels in favour of a single one: Americans.

--

--