The Human Intelligence Protocol Interface

Brian Piere
3 min readNov 6, 2017

--

Six years ago I discovered the key to artificial intelligence and began working on software that is capable of defeating the Turing Test with a small universal codebase that works across all topics and languages. In the course of my research I discovered something even more important, the basis of intelligence itself. It sounds outrageous, I know that. However I absolutely believe this and, to date, nobody has being willing to challenge such claims. After discovering the fundamentals of intelligence I put the A.I. project on hold and began designing software to harness an invaluable algorithm.

My rationale has been that exploiting the fundamentals of genuine-intelligence should have priority over its artificial counterpart because software designed to exploit the former will give humanity the tools to collectively figure out anything, including the latter.

It has taken me five years to develop the Human Intelligence Protocol Interface (HIPI). I didn’t want to release a prototype until I was sure that it would be impermeable to philosophical criticism. I’ve filled up hundreds of pages in engineering workbooks and built numerous prototypes throughout the journey. It seemed that no mattered what I tried there would always be some problem preventing the system from working flawlessly across a large-scale collective. It was terribly frustrating, like stepping on a bubble and having it pop out in another place. Late in 2016 I tried something new with the contradiction process and it proved to be the breakthrough I needed. It was an amazing experience because the complexity contracted while simultaneously addressing all of the issues that had plagued my passion for half of a decade.

I’m positive that prototype you will see is ready for critique. It’s simplicity is deceiving and therefore its importance is easy to miss.

What is the HIPI?

The HIPI is a framework for intelligent discussion and debate. For the first time it has become possible to unambiguously and unanimously determine who is not-wrong (i.e. right).

The HIPI has two main purposes.

  1. To be used as a system for a questions & answers or for assertions & rebuttals. The application supports symbolic linking so that duplicate content can be addressed without repetition.
  2. All content may be subjected to a contradiction process whenever the validity of content comes into question. This is where the real power of the system comes from. All entries begin as true-by-default and this inverts the burden of proof. That is, information is correct when it’s not-wrong.

Why is the HIPI so Important?

  1. The system becomes more intelligent over time because contradictions are recycled across all topics for all time. Unlike a blog where good ideas become buried under pagination, the HIPI gives its users confidence that their wisdom will never become obscured.
  2. Good ideas automatically rise to the top when they are attacked and survive. Controversial issues which are not-wrong are the things which people should know about.
  3. Valid information is derived without any notion of authority, rank, or moderation. Information should stand on its own merits, irrespective of the person’s reputation who judges it.
  4. The system helps people say things which CAN be said (using auto-complete) when such statements are the survivors of a CANT.
  5. The methodology produces unanimous outcomes. There is no need to collect “I like’s”, up-votes, or down-votes. Democracy is just a signal of popularity, not intelligence.
  6. A person’s reputation is derived from their “trust factor”. That is, if a person is unlikely to say something which will become contradicted then their reputation meter increases. This metric can help other users find followers who have important and trust-worthy things to say.

What is Next?

The current website www.hipi.tech demonstrates the methodology for intelligent collective adjudication, however any information that users add will be lost upon refresh. The next step is to develop a site like StackExchange.com and/or a web-service to replace blogging.

--

--

Brian Piere

I live to see the day when the world lays down their arms and begins collaborating intelligently and openly in the information age.