Science: where finding nothing is the biggest victory of all
Ethan Siegel
482

You are superficially right but totally wrong in the deepest point.

“The truth is that the laws of physics we have in place are the most successful sets of laws we’ve ever come up with. They’ve been tested more robustly than any other set of laws ever, and they’ve passed every single one.”

Yes, SM has passed every TEST you (and all other physicists) want to play. But, SM has failed every TEST which I throw at it. There are only four simple litmus tests.

#how2CalculateAlpha

#how2CalculatePlanckCMBdata

#how2CalculateHiggsbosonMass

#how2CalculateCosmologyConstant

Can SM pass these four simple tests? A big No.

If no theory can pass these tests, SM can stay at the throne by claiming it is {the Only game in town}. But, those simple litmus tests are PERFECTLY passed and answered.

See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/totally-blind-deaf-googlefacebookblogosphere-era-jeh-tween-gong

See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/totally-blind-deaf-googlefacebookblogosphere-era-jeh-tween-gong

See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/dark-energydark-mass-the-silent-truth/

See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/dark-energydark-mass-the-silent-truth/

See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/before-lhc-run-2-begins-enough-jeh-tween-gong

See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/before-lhc-run-2-begins-enough-jeh-tween-gong

See https://medium.com/@Tienzen/coin-analogy-is-better-but-is-still-wrong-2925a7ed4f1c#.lvi10ia8n

See https://medium.com/@Tienzen/coin-analogy-is-better-but-is-still-wrong-2925a7ed4f1c#.lvi10ia8n

These are just four simple numbers. How can there be an (any) argument whether {(137.0359… ) = (137.0359…)} is right or not? So on and so forth for all other three simple numbers.

Note (added on September 6, 2016): One jerk has indeed called {(137.0359… ) = (137.0359…)} as crackpot. Calling name is easy and cheap. I have put $10,000 award prize for this at http://tienzen.blogspot.com/2016/08/two-thumbs-up.html

http://tienzen.blogspot.com/2016/08/two-thumbs-up.html

“…but rather that the hints of what comes next requires looking far, far deeper than we’re presently looking. That means higher energies, larger telescopes, more particle collisions, more sensitive detectors, more significant digits closer to the speed of light or absolute zero and quite likely better, newer ideas than the ones we’ve been pursuing fruitlessly for so long.”

This is a total nonsense. The answers are here. But, the FOUNDATION for the new physics which provides these answers is totally different from the mainstream physics.

SOME tests (your kind) will never provide the truths. My tests do.

A fair assessment on M-string theory for layman is available here, https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/09/11/the-era-of-hope-or-total-bullcrap/

https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/09/11/the-era-of-hope-or-total-bullcrap/

The current (2016) mainstream physics status is this: #PostCheckmateTTF (Post Checkmate temper tantrum fit).

See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/08/26/vision-eulogy-the-post-checkmate-temper-tantrum-fit/