If You Ain’t First, You’re Last

As the world waited for LeBron James to make his decision, we were reminded again of how attempting to be the first to report a major sports story is worth risking all journalistic credibility in 2014.


“Don’t you remember the time you told me, ‘If you ain’t first, you’re last’?… I’ve live my whole life by that!” — Ricky Bobby

Hundreds attended, thousands were invested, and millions watched as LeBron James gathered the world around him for his decision to take his talents to South Beach in 2010. The aftermath was harsh as the city of Cleveland watched their basketball Savior choose another fan base over them. Many reporters, both local and national, were left with their head in their hands as they had wagered a career’s worth of credibility on sources and information that turned to quicksand as the impenetrable camp around James came to show their indecisiveness — James himself didn’t even know his own answer until the day of the announcement.

But what may have been the worst takeaway from that entire media circus was that not only did those journalists covering James’ decision survive their hasty and premature reports, their renown grew from it.

Photo: Walter Looss Jr./SI

Fast forward to the present day. Thanks to the masterful work of Lee Jenkins at Sports Illustrated, the world — and I may very well mean ‘the world’— knows about the return to Cleveland. Even my 50+ year-old mother, who has not an ounce of care for the game of basketball in her body — knows of James’ decision to return home and lead Ohio’s crusade to bring an NBA Championship to the city of Cleveland.

That is now common knowledge, but the way it became common knowledge seems to be at the expense of journalistic integrity.

I’ll admit this: I loved the LeBron James circus. Maybe it’s because I couldn’t care less where he ended up— I’d watch him regardless. For two weeks I logged on to Twitter and Facebook to see “sources” saying this and “sources” saying that. It annoying, sure, but I took it as what it was.

None of these people knew where James was going to end up.
Screenshot: Lori Schmidt/97.1 The Fan

It was a total crap shoot, and for me, that was OK; I enjoyed all the memes, the jokes and the speculations because my job wasn’t on the line. I was simply an observer — sitting back and watching the world burn, if you will.

But for people like Chris Broussard, Brian Windhorst, Chris Sheridan and all these other media machines whose jobs now required them to spew out any kind of whisper in the wind they may hear about where James was going to end up, was kind of sad — and, in a way, I feel bad for them.

Jeff Pearlman of Sports Illustrated wrote a piece on his personal blog talking about how reporting major news has changed over the years. He talked about how Sports Illustrated was built on the principle of facts, if you weren’t 100 percent concrete on what you were writing, you didn’t write it.

But in 2014, every single person with Internet connection is a journalist, whether they want to be seen that way or not.

Social media has changed the game. News is no longer verified by the source from which it is received; it’s just news, no questions.

In another great venting piece from Craig Calcaterra of Hardball Talk, he talks about how news is digested here in the modern age. Twitter began as a great platform for news. You followed the people you knew were credible, such as newspaper writers or authors you knew had built stake in what they put out there. But I can assure you, Twitter — and the Internet media as a whole — is no longer about that.

We live in the age of the media vultures. Manual retweets and ‘copy-paste’ journalism run amuck, and really, there’s nothing we can do about it. The concept of instant journalism started out as a blessing, but it’s turned into a much worse curse for those that wish to make it a career.

Certain people will attempt to stay true to giving credit where credit is due by listing sources and links back to the originator of a piece, idea or report, but those people are in the minority and I’m afraid their alliances are only shrinking.

You know all those follows TMZ gets for reporting anything they hear first? Yeah, they keep those even after they’re proved wrong on a story they may publish prematurely. You know all those retweets and clicks leech accounts get when they simply rip a picture or quote that could have a high rate of popularity? Yeah, they get remembered for being the account you saw that from first.

You know that Sports Illustrated story Lee Jenkins put together on LeBron James announcing his decision to return to Cleveland before anyone else had the scoop? Yeah, it’s not even the top link on Google when you search “Sports Illustrated LeBron James.”

Why do some “journalists” risk all credibility to be first rather than waiting to be right? Simply put, because there isn’t much of a negative risk at all.

Email me when Trevor Sikkema publishes or recommends stories