“Ms. Clinton’s emails have endured much more scrutiny than an ordinary person’s would have, and the criminal case against her was so thin that charging her would have been to treat her very differently,” writes the Post editorial board” ABSOLUTELY UNTRUE. Any ordinary person would be in jail….period. There was plenty of evidence to indite Ms. Clinton on the emails. Per James Comey, the ONLY reason she was not indited was because he could not prove “intent” and therefore felt the case would be difficult to win. With subsequent email releases however, we see multiple devices (she lied about the server being so she would only have 1 device), willful destruction of emails after the discovery of the server (no idiot, not “whipped with a cloth” but with a secure deletion program intentionally) and destruction of devices with a hammer. We see answers to the FBI on recognizing classified information that clearly show that either she is completely ignorant or that she is a liar. There is no other option. There is no option available to anyone who is informed on the email but to conclude that Mr. Comey set out to find a reason …any reason, to avoid prosecution to save his career knowing that the Justice department would not prosecute her anyway. Its a good old boy network …or girl network in this case. We now also know the reason she was so quick to securely delete emails and destroy devices. She was clearly selling access to the State department using the Clinton Foundation as a money laundering organization. Anyone who can not see what was going on at this point is simply willfully ignorant and would find a reason not to charge her if video emerged of her eating a child.