Why I became a disaster expert

Armen Grigoryan, Climate change and disaster risk reduction expert for UNDP in Europe and Central Asia, recalls the tragedy that changed the course of his life.

Children in north Armenia commemorate the Spitak earthquake. Photo: Jodi Hilton/UNDP

Thirty years ago, a powerful earthquake ripped through my home country of Armenia, leaving 25,000 dead; 500,000 homeless and annihilating an estimated 40 percent of the national economy.

The northern city of Spitak and many other villages around it were wiped out completely.

I was 20 and felt helpless, angry and at the same time eager to act. The police and army were clearly overwhelmed. Ordinary people tried to remove the rubble, while soldiers stood outside the central bank to prevent people from looting it.

Nune Movsisyan was 21 years old when a 6.8 magnitude earthquake struck Spitak, levelling her house with her inside. Photo: UNDP Armenia

Rescue teams and humanitarian cargo started to pour into Armenia three days after the earthquake. Cars blocked the incoming aid on some of the main arteries. There was no reception center at the airport and no available transport from Yerevan to the affected areas. The government came under heavy criticism for its lack of coordination of the aid response.

Two years earlier, Soviet authorities had been accused of covering up Chernobyl. This time around, they decided to publicly announce the disaster. The outspoken Armenian diaspora in the West also put pressure.

As a result, this was the first disaster within the Soviet Union where foreign aid was allowed to intervene. The entire world descended on the quake zone: Russians, Italians, French, Germans, Czechs and Georgians, all with their cranes and tractors, food and medical supplies.

Armenia lies in one of the most seismically active regions of the world. Earthquakes have affected large numbers of people and caused significant economic losses over the past 30 years.

My friends and I wanted to help. I went to Spitak, and what I saw there was unimaginable. An army friend of mine died in the rubble (just five days after returning from military duty), along with fifty-three children in the same building. “We cried and worked, hoping to find someone alive”, his family said.

After helping out for three days, I left as the French arrived. We had become a burden, needing food, water and shelter. And though we thought of ourselves as strong young folks, physical and mental strength turned out to be very different things.

The population, economy, and environment of Armenia are highly vulnerable to natural hazards.

The aftermath

The earthquake in Spitak triggered the first wave of Armenian emigration in modern history. In total, 500,000 left, having lost their jobs, homes and in many cases friends and relatives.

The event brought seismology and earthquake preparedness in Armenia to new heights. The population also became intensely aware of its surroundings. For instance, the nearby town of Kirovakan was known for its chemical factory. While there were officially no major leaks, people felt insecure as the plant descended into disrepair.

Quickly, the cemeteries around Spitak outgrew nearby villages. There were villages built by the Italians, a hospital staffed by Norwegians, a residential block erected with money from Uzbekistan, schools and hospitals from Russia and Ukraine and even a street rebuilt by Georgia.

To make matters even worse, a conflict with neighboring Azerbaijan erupted that year. That and the collapse of the Soviet Union slowed down recovery efforts as Western teams departed. In the midst of war, Armenia prioritized security over reconstruction.

Preparedness and recovery

One of the by-products of the earthquake was the creation of a UN mechanism that immediately deploys national search and rescue teams to disaster sites. That system has served hundreds of disasters and saved thousands of people.

Having experienced a devastating earthquake first hand and noticed its long-lasting consequences, I became a disaster expert at UNDP, focusing on preparedness and long-term economic recovery.

Developing seismic building codes and standards is part of the preparedness framework.

Nowadays, preparing for natural disasters is not just a science and a practice. It is part of every international development framework. Because economic investments and living standards can be razed to the ground within a few minutes, as was the case in Armenia, how do we limit the possible impact of such a disaster? Governments, which are primarily responsible for protecting people, need to work on risk maps, early warning mechanisms, building standards, insurance mechanisms and many other important measures.

Today, Armenia has among the best seismic building codes and has all the laws in place to enable a quick emergency response. It even sends experts abroad. These efforts cannot bring back the people we loved. But should the worst happen again, they could protect many more down the line.

A Disaster Risk Reduction National Platform was established in 2010.

A version of this blog was originally posted on ipsnews.net.


Text by Armen Grigoryan, photos: UNDP Armenia