This is an unfair rhetoric to even propose, surely?
Some ethical boundaries can be universally understood, and sometimes they’re more personal. But neither can attack the design standards and quality.
You can’t justify an attack on a lobbyist’s skill of communication and persuasion because their cause is different to your personal beliefs. You need to oppose the cause itself.
Or damn the designers of Apple because they have unethical tax practices.
The AK47 is a great machine, as is a tank etc. but that recognition doesn’t have to influence me in to thinking war is a good thing because of it.