The science of evil
What’s the difference between NPD (narcissistic personality disorder) and MNPD (malignant narcissistic personality disorder)?
BASICS
- malignant narcissism > narcissism
( malignant ~ evil, extremely destructive ) - malignant narcissism ≠psychopahthy
(but lots of psychopath’s are malignant narcissist too) - there is no such a thing officially in DSM as MNPD. It’s more like a theoretical diagnostic category. Why not?
Its too much moral responsibility for poor shrinks, even if evil has some roots, that is definable by science.

EXAMPLES
In the Game of Thrones, you can study a bunch of them, because more than ~75% of the main protagonist are narcissist in a certain level, with our actual cultural terms*.
IMHO:
Cercei Lannister → malignant narcissist
Tywin Lannister → malignant narcissist
Melisandre → malignant-like narcissist
Tyrion Lannister → “regular” celebral narcissistic-traits
Jamie Lannister → “regular” somatic narcisstic-traits
( * note, that the “good guys” Self’s are developing into a less pathological and more mature direction through the seasons. They are recovering narcissist :) )

Scott Peck (psychiatrist & theologian) wrote a book about the subject.
If you are interested in the differentiation of evil narcissist and not so evil narcissist, that’s a good material. (except for the “exorcism” woo-woo chapters, I would skip it if I were you.)
MALIGNANT NARCISSISM
“Narcissism, or self-absorption, takes many forms.
Some are normal.
Some are normal in childhood but not in adulthood.
Some are more distinctly pathological than others.The subject is as complex as it is important.
It is not the purpose of this book, however, to give a balanced view of the whole topic, so we will proceed immediately to that particular pathologic variant that Erich Fromm called ‘Malignant Narcissism’.
Malignant Narcissism is characterized by an un-submitted will.
All adults who are mentally healthy submit themselves one way or another to something higher than themselves, be it God or truth or love or some other ideal.
(…)
M Scott Peck The People of the Lie Simon and Schuster, Inc., copyright © 1983, pg. 77–78
( Amazon: https://amzn.to/2Q7W7IL )
DEFINING EVIL
When you try to differentiate between these two conditions (malignant vs “regular” narcissism), practically you try to define maybe destructive but not evil behavior patterns from evil behavior patterns.

Is evil definable? Or we just try to not use it in a scientific context?
According to Scott Peck, we shouldn’t evade these questions and yes, with psychological terms, we can define evil:
An evil person:
- Is consistently self-deceiving, with the intent of avoiding guilt and maintaining a self-image of perfection
- Deceives others as a consequence of their own self-deception
- Projects his or her evils and sins onto very specific targets (scapegoats) while being apparently normal with everyone else (“their insensitivity toward him was selective” (Peck, 1983/1988, p 105[10])
- Commonly hates with the pretense of love, for the purposes of self-deception as much as deception of others
- Abuses political (emotional) power (“the imposition of one’s will upon others by overt or covert coercion” (Peck, 1978/1992, p298[9]))
- Maintains a high level of respectability, and lies incessantly in order to do so
- Is consistent in his or her sins. Evil persons are characterized not so much by the magnitude of their sins, but by their consistency (of destructiveness)
- Is unable to think from the viewpoint of their victim (scapegoat)
- Has a covert intolerance to criticism and other forms of narcissistic injuryMost evil people realize the evil deep within themselves but are unable to tolerate the pain of introspection, or admit to themselves that they are evil. Thus, they constantly run away from their evil by putting themselves in a position of moral superiority and putting the focus of evil on others. Evil is an extreme form of what Scott Peck, in The Road Less Traveled, calls a character and personality disorder.
( Amazon: https://amzn.to/2Q7W7IL )
