Important note: This story was based on some misleading data supplied by Snap as part of its political ad transparency work, which led us to draw an incorrect conclusion. We performed this analysis in good faith — had the data been correctly labelled, we would not have researched, written and published the piece.
You can read about what happened here:
Snap’s bad data and our bad reading of it
Last week we wrote a story based on Snap’s latest political ad transparency data. The data was labelled inaccurately…
Though the original piece did include data and context about the wider campaign in Uxbridge we believe to be valid, we have removed it in full to avoid confusion and the possible further propagation of a misleading analysis.