Just as there is an ecology for nature. There is an ecology of technology.

The Wotanic Space memetic framework from an infrastructure point of view, will be based primarily on Russian Nouvelle Droite principles.

America has more technological patents than Russia and China has more infrastructure, but how do these technologies operate together in a post-laissez faire environment.

We say post-laissez faire, because of the possibility of a survivalist situation that could happen from an isolated world. Not from geopolitics, but from either extraterrestrial invasion or global catastrophe. The catastrophe does not necessarily have to come from political consequences or human warfare (Between humans), but from outside forces beyond our planet, or environmental degradation, because of the ignorance of the human race.

The Wotanic Space Corporation is composed of Human Beings who will convert into a truly over-human genome. We will eventually no longer reproduce with Homo Sapiens as we will become another species entirely.

We are materialists in the sense we believe in a physical empirical basis of reality, but we are also post-materialist in the sense understanding the causes and effects that are from unseen and unknown phenomena. We do not spiritualize these causes, but seek to explore their basis. We are post-racialist supremacists in that we do not adhere to traditional identity in ethnic and geographic genetic legacy. However, we do believe there are differences among the human races, some traits more desirable than others and some traits to be avoided or excluded, but as the future of technology and genetic inheritance. We do not hold a permanent identity with present human racial identities, as a over-human species would be a new genomic structure and identity all together.

The only operational anthropology to survive in galactic travel environments would have to include monandric patriarchy.

The Chinese have a superior genetic legacy in monandric patriarchy, but their socio-economic political ecology leads to an unquestioning nature of a man’s role in productive society.

http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521621311

This book explores the historical roots of economic nationalism within Japan. By examining how mercantilist thought developed in the eighteenth-century domain of Tosa, the author shows how economic ideas were generated within the domains. During the Edo period (1600–1867), Japan was divided into over 230 realms, many of which developed into competitive states that struggled to reduce the dominance of the shogun’s economy. The seventeenth-century Japanese economy was based on samurai notions of service and a rhetoric of political economy which centred on the lord and the samurai class. This ‘economy of service’, however, led to crises of deforestation and land degradation, government fiscal insolvency and increasingly corrupt tax levies, and finally a loss of faith in government. Commoners led the response with a mercantilist strategy of protection and development of the commercial economy. They resisted the economy of service by creating a new economic rhetoric which decentred the lord, imagined the domain as an economic country, and gave merchants a public worth and identity unknown in Confucian economic thought.

  • Challenges the centre-outward notion of Japanese development • Based on previously unused archival sources • Reveals the influence of ecological factors on pre-modern historical change
One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.