coz 1 long word contains in depth specialist concepts you can’t explain in an article
Not Important
21

I think you’re misinterpreting the article. The author is not against using long words. He’s against using long words when there is a shorter one that means exactly the same. Politicians are masters at it. See this George Carlin video for some highly entertaining examples: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEeDRUZIDq8