Night say something

Today, I saw a girl’s face.

She was looking straight at me, gazing into my eyes.

I sensed peace within her.

She remained silent, and her eyes reflected the color of my baby’s hair.

Then, I heard the joyous voice of Meryko saying, “ღამე თქვი რამე — night say something.”

Meri is the Georgian name
for this Georgian woman, and “ღამე თქვი რამე” is written
in the Georgian language.

Each word in the phrase “ღამე თქვი რამე” is 4, 4, and 4 symbols long, 12 in total, and sounds like a song of the nature.

English equivalent has 5, 3, and 9 symbols 17 in total.

In Georgian the word heaven (6) is written as “სამოთხე (7)” and it sounds like “three-four-tree”.

In Georgian hell sounds like “the place for a little trees.”
The word face captures meaning like “the place for a tree”.
Below are the languages of humans composed of a tree structure.

In the tree above, Georgian is a branch of the Caucasian languages, dating back to 3000 BC.

It, in turn, branches from the main trunk of the language tree.

As we can see all languages are branches of the one mother language.

In Georgian, the word for human is “adam-iani,” written as “ადამიანი,” capturing the essence of “Adam kind.”

This exemplifies the process of transforming concepts from the Georgian language into the English lexicon.

The beauty lies in the simplicity of creating new words.

Merely jotting down a name on paper opens the door to crafting sentences that define the essence of the newly coined term.

This fluidity in language allows for an organic evolution of vocabulary.

A noteworthy characteristic of the languages belonging to Adamkind is their remarkable flexibility.

Specifically, a Georgian sentence comprises four main parts.

This complexity arises from the ability of Georgian verbs to interconnect with up to three parts of a sentence.

For instance, in the sentence “მამამ შვილს სახლი აუშენა — The father built his son’s house,” the verb “აუშენა” seamlessly integrates and forms the three syntactic components of the sentence.

To illustrate this linguistic flexibility, we present eight versions of the same sentence, each conveying an identical idea with nuanced variations.

This sentence can have a total of 256 configurations.

With four positions to fill and four words in total (father, son, home, and built), the mathematical combination yields 4 * 4 * 4 * 4 = 256 possible arrangements (configurations).

I am a programmer who is familiar with the observation that none of this flexibility that we find in the languages of Adamkind exists in the world of computer programming.

Let’s introduce a groundbreaking compositional unit in computing.

The “არადანი-NotAndOr” protocol, unit of composition, embodies the same properties we’ve previously explored and is inherently scalable.

Below, we present an actionable sentence (asentence) with which we are already acquainted, showcasing the potential of this new compositional unit.

Comprising six actionable words (aword), the asentence strategically places two special awords at its extremities.

These awords serve the purpose of cyclically directing the execution flow between them.

To grasp the concept of flow and execution colors, I recommend referring to my previous articles.

• Actionable Word: Goto’s Venture into Unexplored Programming Realms.
• In the beginning was the goto, and the goto was with CPU, and the goto was CPU.

Execution initiates in yellow, progresses until the conclusion, transitions to lime, and then seamlessly turns to the beginning, as depicted in the diagram.

This cyclic flow ensures that execution traverses the asentence three times — Yellow, Lime, and Green.

The key innovation lies in rendering the order of aword placement within a sentence inconsequential.

Each aword type discerns its execution time based on the flow color.

For instance, verbs execute during the Green phase.

This approach democratizes programming, empowering anyone to construct actionable sentences (asentence).

Below, we illustrate how junctions function within this innovative protocol.

Consider the “AND” junction as an illustrative example; its role is to link the left side of the asentence to its right side.

When the “AND” junction encounters flow in yellow, it redirects it backward in lime, emulating the behavior of the aword “dot.”

Subsequently, the left-side junction mirrors the behavior of the aword at the beginning, prompting the flow to change direction again.

At any juncture, an aword can opt to alter the flow color, signifying error conditions.

In the AraDaNi protocol, two error conditions correspond to the red and blue flow colors, providing a versatile mechanism for error signaling.

This brief overview provides a bird’s eye view of the AraDaNi protocol.

Thank you.