Because if someone dares share an opinion that slightly differs from your own, they’re condemned of being labeled as a racist bigot. You are guilty of the same rash generalizations you profess to despise so greatly. The “pussies” you speak of are those who have a panic attack when they see “Trump 2016" written in chalk on their college campus; they are those who are pathologically incapable or unwilling to view or accept an opinion that threatens their own ideologies or false beliefs, the former of which is masked under a false sense of cultural enlightenment. As terrified as I am of the possibility that Trump can indeed be the next president of these United States, I am not nearly as dimwitted enough to proclaim all his followers as being bigoted, white-privileged racists. Comparing Trump to Hitler? Funny how political correctness applies when Trump says something obscene but not for his criticizers who compare him to a 20th century fascist and trivialize the 11 million victims of the holocaust. If you want to make a point, introduce facts and numbers and leave emotion out of it. Condemning a group of people of being morally corrupt because they see your views as misguided and groundless may be an acceptable form of debating nowadays (becoming more and more fashionable as the race-baiters continue to canonize thugs and wish death onto cops), but it sure as hell doesn’t make you right. In short, grow up. Ezinne Ukoha