Abraham Samma
Aug 9, 2017 · 1 min read

Interesting. Never really knew about this. However, the Japanese empire was a very, VERY proud empire with an even more proud military. I mean, even after the first bomb was dropped, they didn’t surrender. And even when the Emperor wanted to surrender, the military would have none of it and even instigated a coup to keep the war going and their honour intact. A conditional surrender may have been preferable, but Truman wanted unconditional surrender. And the bombs imho definitely ensured they would get that. Why was unconditional surrender preferable? To ensure a finality to the struggle. An armistice is no finality (Korea), a conditional surrender cannot ensure a complete cessation of hostilities in the future also (though this is debatable). An unconditional surrender with subsequent socio-political restructuring by the victor? You just got yourself peace and an ally (and perhaps more) all in one go. I think that was the endgame and justification.

    Abraham Samma

    Written by

    Medical doctor, avid learner and founder of maarfapad.com

    Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
    Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
    Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade