Yet another Thing to consider as a Designer
Saba Singh

Long-term learning is a great topic, and I love the idea of exploring how design can more thoroughly produce “things to think with.” In hardware engineering culture, we make sketch models to help us prototype through rough-and-ready conditions and ideas, ask questions, etc. And I wonder if there might be some way of preserving those virtues for longer than the early stages.

In an abstract and philosophical way, I think about Ivan Illych’s notions of “convivial tools”—ones that are flexible, non-coercive, and appropriate-able by multiple users over time. It’s the very opposite of black-boxing, and a way to learn from people taking a truly open and flexible tool and making it grow beyond its creator’s first imaginings.

Writing-wise, it would strengthen your piece by expressing a bit more strongly the homogeneous nature of the current “learning” design choices out there, and then contrasting your idea of building in the design with some stronger language and a little more commitment. What could that really look like? Can you find some strong examples to link to? Etc.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.