Right to Information — A Gateway to address Corruption
The idea that Government withhold information for that public has become outdated. Over the last decade, many countries have enacted legislations on freedom of data. In India, the state run Secrets Act 1923 was enacted to protect the official secrets. The new law intend to disclose information replacing the ‘ culture of secrecy ‘. It will promote public accountability that can trim the malpractices, mismanagement, abuse of discretion and bribery etc. — revolution
OBJECTIVES: The object of RTI is to empower the citizens, promote transparency and accountability inside the working of the Government. The Act is a big step towards making the citizens accustomed to the activities of the Government. Social Activist Aruna Roy has described India’s RTI as “ the most fundamental law the united states has seen.”
Aftereffect of RIGHT TO INFORMATION: Even though the debate on corruption in the nation rages on, the RTI Act is fast growing as an effective anti- corruption tool.
Jan Lok Pal Bill gained tremendous public support with citizens released on the streets of Delhi, Bangalore and other cities to voice their anger over corruption. Where RTI was used by journalists and also the media, the law has a broad base of users. Earlier right to freedom of speech and expression is granted under Article 19(1) of Constitution, but it requires fair and efficient procedure to really make the freedom of information work. Within the first three years, Two million RTI requests were filed. The first and well known movement was by Mazdoor Kissan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) in Rajasthan for that access to village accounts. Case studies and media reports demonstrates RTI is being used to redress individual grievances, access entitlements including Ration Cards and pension. The RTI has paved method for informed citizenry which will strengthen the democratic Government of India. With this Act, we are able to use our to speech and expressions and control the Government activities effectively. The concept of open Government is now a reality with the implementation of RTI Act. The RTI could be called a success only if the bureaucracy accepts they’ve constitutional to serve into.
PROVISIONS OF RTI: Section 3 says all citizens shall have to information. The Act enforces a duty upon the public authorities to disclosed all the. In V.S.Lee V. Condition of Kerala.. the remedy supplied by Parliament is that wherever there is certainly substantial financial support, individuals, have the right to know or information. Section 4(2) states that every public authority shall take constant steps to supply information suo moto towards the public. Thus, the police have to give information voluntarily so that the public have minimum resort to use this Act. People authorities also have to disseminate (making known or communicated the data to the public through notice boards, newspapers, public announcements, media broad casts, internet and inspection of offices of public authority) information widely in all forms which is easily accessible to the public. Information can be acquired by request in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or even in official language from the area U/S 6. Here, the person has to give fees, and if request can’t be made in writing, the Central PIO assuring PIO shall render all help make request on paper form. If the information has been provided correctly or within time, it could be made available by appeal or complaint to the Information Commission U/S (8(a) 1). In The Registrar General V. K.U. Rajasekar, it had been held that Section 8 of RTI specially handles the cases of exemption from disclosure or information when similarly info affects prejudicially the sovereignty and security asia etc. Section 5 says every public authority shall within 100 days of enactment of the Act, designate as many as officers as the Central Public Information Officers or State Public Information Officers. — revolution