Insights to the Impact of Media

Ana Sophia De La Mata
3 min readJun 20, 2024

--

Marshall McLuhan, the noted media theorist, advanced a form of technological determinism where human behavior and societal norms are fundamentally affected through media technologies. The theory has been the subject of intense scholarly argument and criticism. In what follows, I outline three advantages and three shortcomings of his viewpoint, as well as reflect on the matter regarding its practical significance.

Strengths:

Bracing insights: McLuhan’s theory turns cultural convention on its head in stressing that the medium is as important as the message. He forces us to consider the impact of smartphones, social media platforms and television on our visual and behavioral lives.

Holistic Vision: A broad and inclusive vision is encouraged through McLuhan’s attention to the medium as the message. We are asked to notice not just what is being said, but how the dynamic of collective consciousness and social structure changes in response to a different medium.

Predictive Power: McLuhan’s vision of where new media technology would lead us in terms of future societal impacts — from the global village to the explosion of the tribal mind — can be used to predictively envision the future social impacts of current and future technologies.

Limitations:

Critique of Technological Determinism: McLuhan’s theory presents a picture of technology affecting society as if they exist independently of other phenomena. It disregards these variables. For example, while McLuhan predicted that television would mesmerise its audience, this is much more complicated than McLuhan acknowledges. Television programming varies across channels and cultures. We also understand that technology itself does not directly dictate what people do with it — humans play a role. A bicycle is not fully alive but when cycled it can be activated.

Cultural Specificity: the theory doesn’t hold in every culture and setting; McLuhan looked primarily at Western media environments in semicolonial postwar publics, so we don’t get a full sense of how people’s worldviews are being reshaped outside of the West.

Lack of Prescriptive Advice: As useful as McLuhan’s theory could be in helping to diagnose the immense power of media technologies, it leaves many unanswered questions regarding how best to manage their effects productively.

McLuhan’s theory of technological determinism poses significant questions about the power of media to make our world. His work encourages us to interrogate the power of technologies and potential blindspots in how they impact society. I have found McLuhan’s focus on the power of media technologies thought-provoking and many of his insights very much at play in our digital era. It is vital though that we approach this with a skeptical eye, mindful of McLuhan’s limitations and the need to better understand his view of media in different and diverse cultural and societal contexts. McLuhan’s theory forces us to rethink our relationship with media and technology. It compels us to think about the possibilities as well as pitfalls associated with our media and technology use in orderly and productive ways going forward. In this essay, I have drawn on McLuhan’s most powerful insights, his emphasis on the power of media to shape our world, using his notion of the global village to engage critically with our World Wide Web. It is with a critical eye that we must think about McLuhan, focusing on the possibilities and pitfalls associated with his theory of technological determinism in the digital age.

References:

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill.

Media Theory. (2024, May 3). Marshall McLuhan: Exploring the media theorist’s Vision. https://mediatheory.net/marshall-mcluhan/

Thompson, A. (2020, July 20). Understanding Media by Marshall McLuhan. Alex Thompson’s Exams Site. https://u.osu.edu/thompson.3374/2020/07/20/understanding-media-by-marshall-mcluhan/

--

--