Andrew Endymion
Jul 10, 2017 · 1 min read

True story.

The idea that is was not a big story has always been absurd. There were at least three different issues a potential voter could’ve found problematic:

A. Reckless handling of confidential information—this wasn’t very compelling b/c it would appear our government’s cyber-security is sieve-like regardless of where information is stored.

B. Hillary Clinton operating like she’s above rules in place for mere mortals—this still wasn’t very compelling since she and Bill have long-since established a pattern of behavior that has made such a mentality clear. It’s bothersome, but not exactly news.

C. Clinton clearly trying to defeat FOI requests and limit governmental transparency—this one bothered me to no end b/c it’s a huge problem in DC yet the biggest media outlets were giving her a total pass, thus ensuring similar obfuscation in the future (much like it gave Obama a pass for hiding certain dealings despite promising to be the most transparent administration ever).

Opinions will differ, but the point is American voters could’ve justifiably had sincere concerns about the server and huge media outlets (as well as influential politicians) insisting it was much ado about nothing only made the situation worse.

    Andrew Endymion

    Written by

    Leans to the left, but sees reason on both sides if you get beyond the leadership. Hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty are my pet peeves.