Parquet File Format with Other File Formats: Pros and Cons

ile formats commonly used in big data processing and explore their respective pros and cons.

Photo by Artturi Jalli on Unsplash

When it comes to storing and processing big data, choosing the right file format can make a significant impact on performance, storage costs, and data accessibility. In this blog post, we’ll compare Parquet, a popular columnar file format, with other file formats commonly used in big data processing and explore their respective pros and cons.

Parquet

Parquet is a columnar file format that is highly optimized for big data processing. It stores data in columns, rather than rows, which enables more efficient data compression and faster query performance. Additionally, Parquet supports features like predicate pushdown and column projection, which further improve query performance by reducing the amount of data that needs to be read from disk.

Pros

• Efficient compression: Parquet’s columnar storage format enables efficient data compression, reducing storage costs.
• Fast query performance: Parquet’s columnar storage format and support for predicate pushdown and column projection enable faster query performance.
• Compatible with many big data tools: Parquet is compatible with a wide range of big data processing frameworks, including Apache Spark, Apache Hive, and Apache Impala.

Cons

• Higher CPU usage: Parquet’s efficient compression capabilities can lead to higher CPU usage, which can impact query performance in some cases.
• Slower write performance: Writing data to a columnar format like Parquet can be slower than writing to row-based formats like CSV.

CSV

CSV (comma-separated values) is a row-based file format that is widely used for data exchange between applications. It stores data in rows, with each row separated by a comma. While CSV is a simple and widely supported file format, it can be inefficient for big data processing, particularly when it comes to querying large datasets.

Pros:

• Simple and widely supported: CSV is a simple file format that is widely supported by applications and tools.
• Easy to read and write: CSV can be easily read and written by humans and machines.
• Lightweight: CSV files are typically lightweight and can be easily transferred between systems.

Cons:

• Inefficient for large datasets: CSV’s row-based storage format can be inefficient for querying large datasets, particularly when only a subset of the columns are needed.
• No support for data types: CSV does not support data types, which can lead to data loss or errors when importing data.

JSON

JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight and flexible file format that is widely used for web-based applications. It stores data in a hierarchical format, with data elements represented as key-value pairs. While JSON is a popular file format for web applications, it can be inefficient for big data processing due to its hierarchical storage format.

Pros:

• Lightweight and flexible: JSON is a lightweight and flexible file format that is easy to read and write.
• Easy to parse: JSON is easy to parse and can be easily converted to other file formats.
• Supports complex data structures: JSON supports complex data structures like arrays and nested objects.

Cons:

• Inefficient for large datasets: JSON’s hierarchical storage format can be inefficient for querying large datasets, particularly when only a subset of the columns are needed.
• No support for data types: JSON does not support data types, which can lead to data loss or errors when importing data.

Avro

Avro is a row-based file format that is designed to support efficient data serialization and deserialization. It supports schema evolution, which enables the modification of the schema without requiring changes to the data. While Avro is a flexible and efficient file format, it may not be the best choice for all big data processing needs.

Pros:

• Avro is a compact format that supports efficient data compression.
• It supports schema evolution, which enables data schema to evolve over time without breaking compatibility.
• Avro is widely used in Hadoop ecosystems and is supported by a range of big data processing frameworks.

Cons:

• Avro files are row-based, which can result in inefficient data access for certain types of queries.
• The schema definition for Avro can be complex, which can make it difficult to work with for some users.

Parquet is columnar storage format that offers several advantages over other file formats. Its columnar storage format, support for predicate pushdown, and efficient data compression capabilities make it well-suited for large datasets and complex queries. While other file formats like CSV and JSON are more widely used and supported, they are not as well-suited for big data processing. By understanding the pros and cons of each file format, organizations can make informed decisions about which format to use for their data processing needs.