Your article blames Mr. Zuckerberg’s Facebook for Clinton’s defeat because of deliberate marketing persuasions that affect peoples perceptions. You gave an example, “Hillary is a crook”. The fact that the news article is true is why you can’t stand it and want it to disappear. We, the American people, now know a lot about Hillary.
Is a habitual liar (running from a plane under fire from the enemy)
Left four Americans to die in the Benghazi Libya embassy
Has allowed pay-for-play to go on between foreign countries via donations to the Clinton Foundation (quid-pro-quo)
Intended to destroy evidence of her private and treasonous email server
Attempted to destroy Federal emails
Believes late-term abortions are acceptable
Sold 20% of the USA’s uranium to Russia in return for a huge donation to the Clinton Foundation (145 Million dollars), while SOS
These are some of the reasons that her Brand was not so effective. It appears that you want to suppress the ability of grassroots America from viewing news on FB’s media that is contrary to your flavor. We are real subscribers having real opinions. We appreciate the algorithm if one is used.