There is no condecending, I just don’t like that you change for your need the story of Nazism. I’m European and we suffered of nazism. You still continue to compare Trump with Hitler so I understand that nothing can be done to give you a real vision of the past. But…
For the record, Hitler did not make himself. In 1933, the German economy was more than 70% owned by American bankers and industrialists. The biggest companies of today and the great dynasties have enriched themselves on the Nazism which they have encouraged. Ford (Hitler’s mentor), Rockefeller (standard oil), Rothschild, Jp Morgan, the German lab Bayer (now awful Monsanto) … and even Bush’s grandfather (prescott) funded Nazism and helped him become what he became later. Simply, if Wall Street stopped the credit opened to Germany, The German economy would have collapsed in a few weeks. This has not been done.
Do you also know about Operation Paperclip? (Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip)
You want me to be less condescending, ok but please stop editing the Story so that it sticks to your speech.
You continue to compare Trump with Hitler and Nazism, which for me is a blatant proof that History does not interest you and that you do not understand the difference in context, the difference in power taking between a democracy and a totalitarian state And a deadly coup d’etat and millions of deaths.
Clinton, Clinton and still Clinton remains the best choice.
No matter what she did, no matter what the corruption, the dead, you consider that Trump remains a Nazi.
Clinton and Sanders remember? Who stole the vote designating Sanders by stubbling the votes for Sanders by reassigning them to Clinton? It’s probably Trump. Yet forget that too.
Who is corrupt and uses her foundation to get favors using his position as Secretary of State, to practice pay to play? Encore Trump. The scandal Benghazi, Levinsky, Weiner, Huma Abedin, Podesta, etc., etc.
Yes, you’re going to tell me it’s not the same but it is true.
It’s not in the news but what do you think of that ? http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/18/case-against-wasserman-schultz-ex-it-aide-expands-with-4-count-indictment.html
But it is I who am condescending because I recall simple facts?
Already in front of Clinton I had the same vision. I always preferred Obama to Clinton in 2008. But Thousands of dead later, millions of poor Americans later, hundreds of police violence later and a lot of blacks assassinated later (nothing but simple police blunders), The birth of Daesh, the destruction of Libya, Syria, and a Nobel Peace Prize, I put Obama on the same level as Clinton. Am I a nazi ?
And do not make me believe that it is the white supremacists who are responsible for this carnage. No, the president was black and if he had wanted to end the KKK and other supremacist groups, he had only to pass a law. The symbol would have been strong on top of that, lazy Obama.
Besides, You accuse the whites of revenge for having suffered for eight years a black president, so they all voted Trump. … uh, really? But if they had elected Clinton the white (supremacist) instead of OABAMA, would they be dirty racists? The same Clinton you defend against Trump today …?!?
It does not make sense but you do not even realize how much your reflection is taking the road and 100% sticking to the Liberal speech.
“If you’re right, then you’re racist.” The world is more complex than that.
