To begin with, they ignore 3rd party votes and “no votes”. That means (effectively) that they default to a presumption that 3rd parties don’t count and don’t deserve representation.
I don’t see the Court accepting the efficiency gap as an actual objective measure of much of…
Jim Roye
3

I think there’s a different interpretation: when looking at whether district boundaries are fair wrto the major parties, that’s what you look at. All voters deserve representation, but that’s a different issue.

A single golf clap? Or a long standing ovation?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.