Quantum Mechanics: Detecting Four Particle Spin Directions
When quantum physicists attempt to detect spin of a particle, they measure spin based upon an upward/downward axis, where the particle is either spinning clockwise or counter-clockwise. Watch the video below to get caught up.
Parth G notes that because we need to orient particles to an axis, in order to detect spin, that we cannot measure spin along the perpendicular axis.
I’m arguing against the notion that there are only two spin directions, because I believe there are actually four spin directions. If spin does exist, and that it is exhibited through all angles, then I argue that, there must by a +x, -x, +y, and -y spin orientation. This is because, if there were only one orientation then there would exist angular momentum the way that it exists. That’s because, a particle with 45° spin, needs both +x and +y or -x and -y; alternatively, if there is a -45°, we’d need -x and +y or +x and -y. Without all four spins, there would be no way to generate angular momentum (the way we understand it today). This follows the Penrose diagram (shown below).
Also, my intuition says that all things, as in, particles behave like objects in zero gravity, naturally (without influence of gravity). That is, even particles should behave as like the Dzhanibekov effect, with angular momentum. See the video below for an explaination of the Dzhanibekov effect.
So what I’m arguing is that particles, in free-fall space, including subatomic particles, spin like the tennis rack theorem (Dzhanibekov effect). What I’m suggesting is that particle spin will eventually, not just rotate clockwise or counter-clockwise, it will also flip forward or backward through to the perpendicular axis from the calibrating axis. I make this claim, also, alluding to the Earth — which flips its magnetic field. Check out the video below discussing the flipping of the Earth’s magnetic field.
Because electrons move through the Earth’s magnetic field, a geomagnetic reversal, Earth’s magnetic field flipping magnetism, I suggest that, in order for the Earth to keep its electrons, during a flip, is that the electrons too must flip. This flipping process realigns our axis of control to the opposite direction; meaning, when flipped, clockwise is now counter-clockwise and counter-clockwise is now clockwise. Yet, we remain focus around our original control axis, except, we have four directions of spin — when aligned with and up orientation of the chosen axis, the spin directions are: negative clockwise, negative counter-clockwise, positive clockwise, and positive counter-clockwise.While, although, the Dzhanibekov effect has been proven, we have only observed this effect in space (at zero gravity).
Still, I argue that we can actually experiment and find more than just two spin orientations, we can also find two more spin directions when polarity flips. It may be that, due to the Earth’s gravity, we do not see the Dzhanibekov effect. However, just like the tennis racket spinning by human influence, we can also simulate the Dzhanibekov experiment by making constant the work needed to flip spin orientation around the electrons. By observing the electron’s mean average angular momentum, spin, after supplying enough energy to flip the spin orientation, in a cycle, around those electrons, we should be capable of detecting four spin-directions. That is, we are focusing upon the electrons angular momentum, after consecutive orientation flipping. With this method, we allow the exertion of the electrons’ angular velocity; so that the time of life for the electron elapses, and we are left with the electrons coming to a stillness — the point at which we may detect spin. We would be detecting spin based upon where the electron lands after expiring all of the angular momentum of the electrons, so that, they land upon one of the four spin directions: negative clockwise, negative counter-clockwise, positive clockwise, and positive counter-clockwise. Michel discusses an up proton with an up electron (indicating high energy state) and up proton and down electron (indicating a low energy state).
However, we can also include: down proton and down electron, and also, down proton and up electron. This would produce four different spin configurations — which should be accurate to our cardinal co-ordination. For example, we could call these spin directions: Left (up proton and up electron), Up (up proton and down electron, Right (down proton and down electron), and Down (down proton and up electron). We’ll just need to monitor the proton spin, as well as, the electron spin (in order to produce the four different spin directions).
For the purpose of detecting these four spin directions, we postulate that an object in free-fall, which has angular momentum, will behave as like the Dzhanibekov effect — spinning as the object falls, but meeting with thresholds which flip the object upside-down and the spin direction in reverse; going from a slower descent (with less angular velocity and less angular momentum) and oscillating between levitation phases and downward spin.
We say that angular momentum is the necessary factor to produce the Dzhanibekov effect. The video below, shows a graphical representation of and equations for the Dzhanibekov effect.
From the video, the way we structure our experiment and graph needs to be represented as an electron orbiting (horizontally; x axis) around a positron (along the y axis). We can work by flipping the proton. We do this by ramping up or down (opposite of the proton’s original orientation), along a sloping path, where we will influence the proton — 1.6726219e-27 kg (mass; with more mass or energy than the electron — 9.10938356e-31 kg) with gravity; essentially, using gravity to roll the proton either up or down, in an oscillation, revolving around its center. As one may have noticed, the mass of a proton is more than the mass of the electron, therefore, the electron should be unaffected by the flipping of the proton; unless the Dzhanibekov effect occurs through the body of the electron due to anti-gravitational shifting. This will cause the trailing, gravitationally locked electron, to trail the proton while the proton oscillates and flips its original orientation. At this point, we’ll keep track of the spins of the electron as it flips with proton simulating the Dzhanibekov effect.
Understanding that magnetism forms a polarity — that is, magnetism follows through with magnetic field lines, which are bidirectional, means that we may only flip the proton in the opposite orientation of its original axis. That means we cannot flip the proton perpendicular to the original chosen axis. But physicists have not experimented with flipping a proton manually or with some technology to detect spin, doing so; in order to flip the magnetic field for measuring particle spin around the orientation of the control axis — where the flipping of the proton, reverses the direction of the electron flow, and should produce an electron moving as like the Dzhanibekov experiment (just faster). One may argue that the flipping of a proton, involves too much human intervention; to which I argue, that when timing the flipping upon a perfect circadian — a perfect representation of time (as perhaps, using a Hyperion Torus), one should be able to simulate the effect — discovered in zero gravity, so that, there is a constant cycle of flipping the proton used to contain the electrons in orbit. When the oscillations (cycles) are made consistent, there should be no influence by experimenters that would result in compromised data — as all electrons are flipped evenly with protons leading. We know that it is possible to have four spin directions around a proton, the proton just needs to be flipped, in order to establish the other two negative rotations: negative clockwise and negative counter-clockwise. We know this, because we can reverse directions for the flow of current (electricity), as do alternating currents, and flip the energy states of an electron (as described by Michel van Biezen in the fourth video above).
The experiment calls for revolving the proton around its center, as to, create a micro-antigravity environment. Within the parameters of the experiment, by generating gravity through the proton, in order to manipulate it into revolving to its opposite orientation; the trailing electrons should move through the wave path of gravity from the proton. Once the proton is fully flipped, we’ll just need to observe the spin direction of the electron. At a certain point, the electrons will begin to lose angular velocity, as energy within the whole system decreases. At those points, is when angular momentum also diminishes, so that, the electron will slow down and land on one of the four spin directions.
With this experiment, of searching for four spin directions, we suggest that the Standard Model of Particle Physics is not complete; as if we are proven true, then we would need to show all four spin directions. Or perhaps, the Standard Model is complete, except that it needs more specificity by also including the other two negative spin directions. This experiment will also be affective for measuring how capable an electron is able to resist gravity and levitate upwards — as we will be measuring when the proton is upside-down, and we expect the orbiting electron to move like the Dzhanibekov effect, that is, we expect the electron to climb upward; but as the angular velocity decreases with more flips, we are better able to detect spin since those electrons would run out of speed to remain in orbit, so that we can measure where it phases out, detecting the quantum spin regarding four spin directions. In this case, the proton is analogized to the Earth, and the electron is simulating the behavior of the T-handle wrench (as the Dzhanibekov effect takes hold). By detecting four particle spin directions, we could bypass the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, since we would be measuring upon π/2 (half-periods) for particle location, quadrants, where the other π/2 time-frame, could be used to measure the particle’s velocity, all complete in one period (π).
If you liked this article, please hit the ‘Applause’ button below. Or, alternatively, hit subscribe to get the latest articles from me, or perhaps, you’d like to leave a comment — which I promise to try my best to reply.
