Why Should We Believe Without Evidence They Said…TRUTH IS REALITY?

Today I just learned that you don’t have to convince people who does not what to believe with what you know with not enough evidence you cannot just predict or assume certain ideas because there are some that might find your argument delusional the evidence and observations you’ve done does not matter to them. So what’s the point in going through proving your case to people even your own keen refuse to believe you since your idea conflicts their interest…….

I was told this so I refuse to ask what, why, when and where which resulted to your conclusion

Why do we immediately believe authority when they give us information? Because everything they must be logically true, but how about this one with no title, no big achievements, have not yet proven himself worthy knows that the authority who told you certain information is not in the position where he/she is telling the truth but just to convince us that he have observed a case study without any evidence of the theory.

Normally, people who thinks they are smart would believe the authority rather than the nobody even though that both sides don’t have any evidence whatsoever. Why not reason with both arguments hear both sides and let’s see who have the most data which logically no arguments that can disprove, then decide…..

Problem with most people would immediately decide without any reasonable doubt that the authority is correct… Putting their FAITHS into the authority’s argument. I disagree, personally we should dissect both sides and put aside FAITH and use reason and logic to know the truth..

Do We Really Want To Know The TRUTH?Or We Choose To Be Arrogants?

I refuse to be arrogant and I want to stand with my personal judgement given two contradictory arguments. What would I do? I’ll conduct certain tests, observations, throw arguments to disprove each point of both sides without being bias. Then if the authority’s argument make sense towards the reality and truth well I would believe the authority’s case, however if I cannot throw any logical arguments towards the points of the delusional nobody I would say that without any bias that not all the time that someone with authority talks about the truth… Let’s not dictate, but be reasonable with our judgement. Not because this guy is delusional junkie his argument would be 100% delusional let’s give a benefit of the doubt that this guy might be pointing out the truth.. Even the truth is unbearable, unthinkable, can cause a bad effect with certain interest but that’s the truth.. So we rather be arrogant that knowing the truth?? I refuse to be like that and always stand to know what is true even if will lead me to my demise but that’s a fact well I accept it.

THERE IS NO POINT IN PROVING THE TRUTH.. LET’S AVOID.. TO DISAGREE….

Sorry but most people don’t think like I do… I sometimes get ignored by people whom I contradict their interest and objectives but the truth is that I’ve stand with what I see, saw and tested which true towards reality. They most of the time be defensive by convincing others that I’m un-efficient, unworthy to openly conclude my argument just to avoid to be proven wrong. Doesn’t make any sense at all so I conclude that there’s no point of me telling you the truth so let’s not dwell in each others company because we share different views and morals… Do you agree????