Trump’s failures as a businessman in no way make him qualified to be president of the United States. I should state that it is not because he failed, rather the way in which he did it- ensuring he personally was either unscathed or, in fact, benefited from the multiple venture failings, while the burden was overwhelmingly on the workers and contractors he hired. That’s not the mark of a true leader.

No offense, but your understanding of both fiscal policy and economics is severely lacking, at least in this piece. Less government does not necessarily equate to more jobs. It’s true in theory, but our economy is so complex that theories, like that one, rarely work efficiently and in a predictable manner. Further, like most, displayed here is a rudimentary appreciation for the complexity of TPP and its impact on American workers. You state you want less government restriction, but call for the breaking up of big banks, which contradict each other.

You absolutely lost me during your brief concern for “free speech”. As a man who lists studying Supreme Court decisions as one of his hobbies, you should be well aware that our right to free speech does not allow us to be shielded from criticism nor does it mean that businesses, like Twitter and Facebook, are not allowed to censor user created content. Truthfully, I wish I had censored my reading of this post.

I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.