A friend mentioned to me the other day that, as much great content as there is on Startup Law, there isn’t a simple list of things a founder team should assess in choosing their own company counsel. So here it is, leveraging past SHL posts in a distilled form.
Background Reading: Startup Lawyers — Explained.
Are they actually a “startup lawyer”?
The number of lawyers over the years who have attempted to re-brand themselves as startup lawyers — meaning corporate lawyers with a heavy specialization in early-stage technology and venture capital — has gone up significantly. Law has numerous specialties and subspecialties, much like healthcare, and you want to ensure that, if you’re building an early-stage technology company looking to raise outside capital, that your main lawyer(s) has deep experience in exactly that.
See: Startups Need Specialist Lawyers. The last thing you want to end up with is a litigator, patent lawyer, or small business lawyer who thinks that, because he stayed at a Holiday Inn Express, he suddenly knows startup law.
Ask for their AngelList profile, or a list of deals they’ve closed in the last 6 months.
Do they have access to other specialist lawyers that you’ll need?
In line with the above, the first lawyer you’ll need is a startup lawyer, but once the business gets going, you’ll quickly need others, including commercial/tech transactions lawyers, data/privacy lawyers, patent lawyers, trademarks, litigation, etc. They do not need to be under the same firm (and you often benefit if they aren’t), but a serious startup lawyer who represents scaled companies must have direct access to these kinds of specialists to provide responsive counsel to their clients.
A simple “yes, we have access” is not enough. Ask for names, info on how they normally engage, and do your diligence.
Is their infrastructure / cost structure right-sized for what you’re building?
Be realistic about what your company will look like over the next 5 years if things go as planned, and hire a lawyer/firm that can serve that company, without scalability problems. Are you building a narrow app for which a successful exit would be a few million dollars? A solo lawyer would probably be a good fit for you.
Do you legitimately see yourself as on a potential IPO track, and targeting a $15MM Series A in a year or two? Law firms that represent “unicorns” may be a good fit for you, even if they’re much more expensive.
Are you realistically on more of a $2–5MM Series A, and $75–250MM exit path; or maybe you’re more interested in scaling on revenue alone? You’re going to get too big for a solo, fast, but “unicorn” firms are probably overkill for you. Try a boutique law firm.
Are they familiar and aligned with the norms / expectations of my likely investors?
In line with the idea of hiring a right-sized law firm, if you’re not on the unicorn track, you will run into problems if you hire lawyers who generally represent (and target) companies who are.
We see this often when, for example, law firms from Silicon Valley represent a tech startup raising local money in, say, Texas or Colorado. Ecosystems of different sizes often have very different norms and expectations, and you can run into cultural or even process conflicts when your lawyers simply don’t speak the same language as your investors, or other stakeholders. The largest tech ecosystems — SV and NYC — have much more similar market norms, and smaller ecosystems like Austin, Boulder, Seattle, etc. often behave similarly among themselves.
Are they not conflicted with investors you’re likely to raise money from?
Entrepreneurs, and especially first-time entrepreneurs, lean heavily on their startup lawyer(s) for core strategic guidance in navigation negotiations / issues with their main investors. Ensure that the lawyers you hire do not have deep ties to the people who are likely to write you checks, or the lack of true independence of the advice you get can burn you in the end.
Finally, do they “not suck”?
After all of the above, do these folks actually answer their damn e-mails quickly enough? Do they have good technology / processes in place to make your life easier? Do they give real strategic advice, and not make tons of costly mistakes that you end up having to pay for in the long run?
See: Lawyers and NPS.
There are lawyers who will check all of the above boxes, and yet after you talk to their clients, you’ll find that they just suck to work with. Do your homework / research on the more objective checklist items, but in the end never forget to choose lawyers who actually care about doing all the subtle human-oriented things that result in good service.
Originally published at Silicon Hills Lawyer.