This story is unavailable.

Sure, this is a nice expert analysis of a bad NYT column, but we have millions of people who’s understanding of the fallibility of science makes them susceptible to climate counterclaims. Holocaust-comparing tirades only reinforces a view that climate change just might be as much orthodoxy as science. The unsure will read you as exactly what the editorial claims. Let’s try and be educators with some acknowledgement of fallibility and we might win some people over.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.