There is a certain bittersweet irony here that I think all of America needs to see.

This is a hate filled attack on Milo using all of the tactics to assign to him as an internet troll or rather the ultimate internet troll.

First there is guilt by association,

Then there is abusive ridicule,

Followed by an attempt to invoke public scorn,

Throw in some raw hatred,

mix with an attempt at public shaming,

and the result is every bit of internet abuse by the left that has created the rise of alt-right trolls.

The only thing that seems to be lacking is a “Peisistratos” moment where you accuse Milo of physically, mentally, or telepathically assaulting you in your safe space.

That and a foul mouthed endless loop of insults designed to shock your audience.

The rise of Milo comes not from the failure of the right to debate the issues of the day, but from the lefts inability to do so in a reasonable manner.

Your answers to any attempt to debate cannot be that everyone that openly disagrees with you is in a basket of deplorable racists, bigots, homophobic, Islamophobic, xenophobic, redneck, stereotypical white people, race traitors and Uncle Tom’s.

Eventually you’ll have to face the facts that statistics prove you are wrong, that your narratives are based solely on emotion, propaganda only works if people are willing to believe it blindly, and you are living in a country where anyone can stand up to you and tell you why you are wrong.

I created a rule for how you have attacked Milo, it’s like Godwin’s law. I call it “Cobra’s Corollary #13”. It says that people on the internet will always attack with those things they fear being exposed as the most.

The perfect example of this is one man calling another poster a “Fag” or an internet “Nazi”.

It’s a surest sign that you are losing your grip on any debate in the public eye since the tactics of insult only work if you can shut down those you cannot debate.