It is interesting to me that the Nominating Committee found the original post guilty of “us(ing) disparaging or negative comments against opposing candidates”. If that is truly the case, they just admitted that revealing Neva’s client list is, in fact, disparaging or sheds her in a negative light. Given the climate of the Academy, their intrenched corporate sponsorship woes over the years and their [failed] desire to create more “transparency”, I can’t see this playing out well. I’m glad I’m not a paying/voting member this year. Yuck.