The Genocidal Fascist ideology of MAGA.
Deception often thrives on the fuel of hate. To uncover the truth, we must question everything through the lens of empirical evidence.
On January 6th 2021, the world watched in shock as a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol, fueled by a false belief in a stolen election and a desire to ‘Make America Great Again’. This event, and the ideology that underpinned it, did not emerge in a vacuum. It is part of a broader trend that has seen the rise of far-right ideologies, not just in the U.S., but across the globe. In this article, we will delve into the roots of these ideologies, tracing their lineage back to historical fascist movements, and examining their modern manifestations.
Fascism, a term often used but seldom fully understood, has resurfaced in recent years in discussions surrounding the political climate in the United States and beyond. The MAGA movement, closely aligned with the American Republican Party, has been accused of exhibiting characteristics of a fascist ideology, with potentially genocidal implications. This is not a claim made lightly, but rather, it is an observation rooted in patterns of behavior, communication, and policy.
Historically, fascism has been associated with far-right totalitarian regimes that emerged in the early 20th century, most notably in Italy under Benito Mussolini and Germany under Adolf Hitler. These regimes were characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, as well as strong regimentation of society and the economy. Central to their ideology was an intense focus on nationalistic and often racial purity, leading to widespread discrimination, violence, and in the case of Nazi Germany, genocide.
In the modern context, the term ‘fascism’ is often applied to political movements that exhibit similar tendencies, even if they do not mirror historical fascist regimes in every detail. The MAGA movement, for instance, has been criticized for its nationalistic rhetoric, its vilification of certain minority groups, and its attempts to suppress dissent and control the narrative. One particularly concerning pattern is the deliberate conflation of LGBTQ+ identities with harmful stereotypes, such as associating them with grooming behaviors. This tactic not only lacks empirical support but also contradicts a wealth of evidence that refutes these harmful claims. The danger lies in the potential for this rhetoric to incite acts of violence against perceived ‘threats’ to societal norms.
Many people, unfortunately, seem to be waiting for overt acts of mass violence before acknowledging the severity of the situation. However, it’s important to understand that genocide is not solely defined by mass murder. It’s a process, often fueled by a specific intent to eliminate a particular group of people. To fully grasp how a society can move towards genocide, we must first understand the underlying ideology. In this case, it’s crucial to examine why the Republican Party and the broader MAGA Movement are being labeled as fascist.
To further our understanding of fascism, we turn to the work of renowned scholar Umberto Eco, who identified 14 common features of fascism. These characteristics provide a framework for understanding the ideological underpinnings of various historical and contemporary movements. Let’s delve into the first point:
The 14 Points of Fascism
1. Cult of Tradition. “One has only to look at the syllabus of every fascist movement to find the major traditionalist thinkers. The Nazi gnosis was nourished by traditionalist, syncretistic, occult elements.”
Fascist ideologies often glorify the past as a time of greatness and purity. This can be seen in the MAGA movement’s slogan, “Make America Great Again,” which implies a return to a perceived golden age.
It involves the use of symbols, rituals, and historical narratives to foster a sense of national identity and unity, often emphasizing homogeneity and rejecting diversity and multiculturalism. A historical example is the Nazi regime in Germany, which leveraged traditional Aryan values and symbols, such as the swastika and the Nazi salute, to promote a unified national identity.
In the modern era, the “Cult of Tradition” can be observed in far-right movements, such as the alt-right movement in the United States. These groups often advocate for traditional gender roles, family values, and a strong national identity.
2. The rejection of modernism. “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.”
Fascists reject modern ideas and innovations, viewing them as corrupting influences. This can be seen in the far-right’s opposition to progressive social movements, such as LGBTQ+ rights and racial equality.
Fascists tend to advocate for a return to traditional values, prioritizing emotion and intuition over reason and science. This is reflected in their rejection of Enlightenment ideals such as democracy, human rights, and equality, favoring instead a focus on national identity and cultural purity.
Historically, the Nazi party in Germany exemplified this by rejecting Enlightenment values and embracing traditional Germanic culture and values. They promoted authoritarian rule and a state-controlled form of Christianity. These days, some far-right and nationalist movements continue to reject modernism and liberal values, advocating for a return to traditional ways of life. For instance, certain conservative and far-right groups reject transgender rights and gender identity as progressive concepts that contradict traditional gender roles and family values.
3. The cult of action for action’s sake. “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”
Fascists value action over intellectualism, often leading to rash and aggressive behavior. This was evident in the storming of the U.S. Capitol, an act of violence spurred by unfounded claims of election fraud. This belief is rooted in the notion that taking action itself is virtuous, and that hesitation and reflection are signs of weakness.
One historical example of this is the Nazi regime in Germany, which pursued a policy of rapid territorial expansion and conquest, leading to catastrophic military campaigns and disregard for human life. Similarly, the Italian fascist regime under Mussolini also prioritized action and expansion, which ultimately resulted in their alliance with Germany in World War II.
In the contemporary context, we can observe this emphasis on immediate and hasty action in the behavior of some political leaders who prioritize their personal beliefs or emotional impulses over expert advice and thoughtful decision-making. It’s worth mentioning that while this focus on action is not exclusive to fascist ideology, it is a prominent aspect of it, and it often results in disregard for consequences and the lack of prior planning.
4. Disagreement is treason. “The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge.”
Fascists view any opposition to their ideology as a threat. This is evident in the far-right’s attempts to suppress dissent and control the narrative, such as through the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories.
In the past, fascist regimes have employed this belief to justify the repression of political opponents, control of the media, and persecution of minority groups. Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, and fascist Spain are all historical examples of this. Today, this belief continues to manifest in authoritarian regimes where dissent is not tolerated, and those who voice opposition face violence and repression. Populist or far-right movements that have gained power in some countries have also used this belief to suppress political opposition, control the media, and persecute minority groups.
It is critical to understand that this belief is at odds with democratic values like freedom of speech, expression, and the right to dissent. A thriving society must allow for the exchange of diverse ideas and opinions, and not equate criticism or disagreement with treachery.
5. Fear of Difference. “The first appeal of the fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.
Fascists exploit societal fears and prejudices to create a common enemy. This can be seen in the far-right’s vilification of immigrants, refugees, and LGBTQ+ people, who are often portrayed as threats to societal norms.
Historically, this fear of difference has been demonstrated in the persecution of minority groups by fascist regimes, including the Nazis in Germany and fascist movements in Italy and Spain. Today, this fear continues to be a driving force in far-right movements and politicians who scapegoat immigrants and refugees, leading to discrimination and violence against minority communities.
It is crucial to understand that fascism is a complex and dynamic ideology that takes different forms depending on historical and cultural contexts. The examples provided are not exhaustive, but aim to demonstrate how fascist movements have historically used the fear of difference as a tool to gain power and justify violence against marginalized groups.
6. Appeal to social frustration. “One of the most typical features of the historical fascism was the appeal to a frustrated middle class, a class suffering from economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups.
Fascists tap into feelings of discontent and frustration, promising to restore order and greatness. This is a key tactic of the MAGA movement, which appeals to those who feel left behind by societal changes. By harnessing the dissatisfaction, economic uncertainty, and cultural insecurities among certain groups, such as the middle class, fascist movements can win support from individuals who feel that their current political and economic systems have let them down.
Historically, this appeal to frustration can be seen in the rise of fascist regimes in Italy and Germany. The Italian fascist movement led by Benito Mussolini promised to bring back national pride, rejuvenate the economy, and provide greater social mobility to the middle class and rural poor. Similarly, the Nazi party in Germany under Adolf Hitler played on the frustrations of the petite bourgeoisie, who were hard-hit by the economic crisis of the 1930s. In modern times, this trend continues with the growth of far-right movements and political parties in Europe and North America.
These groups often focus on the economic and social frustrations of the working-class and middle-class citizens, blaming immigrants, minorities, and global elites for their problems, and positioning themselves as the only solution. A prime example of this is the MAGA movement in the United States, which has attracted significant support from people who believe that the existing political system has failed them and that their way of life is being threatened by immigrants, minorities, globalists and wokeness.
7. The obsession with a plot. “Thus at the root of the Ur-Fascist psychology there is the obsession with a plot, possibly an international one. The followers must feel besieged.”
Fascists often create a narrative of conspiracy and intrigue, blaming societal problems on a specific group or entity. This is evident in the far-right’s unfounded claims of a “deep state” working against them.
It creates an atmosphere of anxiety and fear, making followers feel as if they are under attack from a hidden, powerful entity. The enemy, real or imagined, is often portrayed as part of an international scheme, and the belief in this conspiracy serves to legitimize extreme measures, such as violence and suppression, in the name of protecting the community from the perceived danger.
In the past, fascist movements have frequently portrayed themselves as being under attack from various groups, including Jews, communists, and minority groups. For instance, during the Holocaust, the Nazi regime in Germany portrayed Jews as a part of a worldwide scheme to control the world and undermine the German people, thus using the belief in a Jewish conspiracy to justify the extermination of six million Jews, along with other minority groups. In contemporary times, similar beliefs in a conspiracy can be seen in far-right and fascist movements, such as the QAnon conspiracy theory that has gained a following in the United States. It claims that a secret cabal of child-trafficking pedophiles is plotting to overthrow the government and destroy America, thus providing a justification for extreme acts, such as the January 2021 storming of the US Capitol building.
8. The enemy is both strong and weak. “By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.”
Fascists paradoxically portray their enemies as both powerful and weak, using this to justify extreme actions against them. This can be seen in the far-right’s portrayal of marginalized groups as both a threat to national security and the economy, yet also as vulnerable and in need of protection. This allows for a perpetual state of fear and mobilization among supporters, and is used to justify extreme actions against perceived enemies who are portrayed as posing a significant and immediate threat to the nation.
Historical examples of this can be seen in the Nazi regime in Germany, where Jews, LGBTQ+ people, and other minority groups were portrayed as controlling the nation’s government and economy, yet also as weak and vulnerable, in need of extermination for the greater good of the nation. This idea can also be observed in modern far-right movements, which often use the dual characterization of immigrants, refugees, and LGBTQ+ people as both a threat to national security and the economy, yet also as vulnerable and in need of protection from supposed oppressors. This belief in a powerful and vulnerable enemy can lead to the restriction of civil liberties and human rights, as well as the use of state violence against marginalized groups.
9. Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. “For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life, rather, life is lived for struggle.”
Fascists reject peace and nonviolence, viewing them as forms of cowardice. This can be seen in the far-right’s advocacy for aggressive nationalistic ideologies and rejection of peaceful coexistence with perceived adversaries. This perspective is rooted in the view that fascism is a highly combative and warlike ideology and that those who advocate for peace are considered to be frail and in submission to the opposition.
This principle is often used to justify acts of military aggression and the silencing of political dissent. In the past, the Nazi regime in Germany is a prime example of a fascist movement that embraced this principle, leading to its aggressive territorial expansion and persecution of perceived enemies, both domestically and abroad. In modern times, similar views are espoused by MAGA and other far-right movements, who advocate for a nationalistic, aggressive ideology and reject the concept of coexisting peacefully with perceived adversaries. It is important to note that this perspective is not exclusive to fascist movements and can be found in other militaristic and authoritarian ideologies as well.
10. Contempt for the weak. “Elitism is a typical aspect of reactionary ideology.”
Fascists view themselves as superior, leading to a disdain for those they perceive as weak or inferior. This is evident in the far-right’s dehumanization and demonization of certain groups, such as people of color and immigrants. Fascists see themselves as part of an exclusive and superior group that gives them the right to treat those they view as weak with contempt. In fascist regimes, this often takes the form of discriminatory policies aimed at specific groups of people such as ethnic minorities, people with disabilities, or those deemed weak or inferior.
The Nazi regime in Germany is a prime historical example, as it believed in the superiority of the German race and used that belief to justify the persecution and extermination of Jews and other minority groups. In Fascist Italy, the government implemented discriminatory policies against ethnic minorities and political opponents, portraying them as weak and inferior through its propaganda. In the present day, we can observe similar attitudes in the rhetoric and policies of far-right and white supremacist groups that express disdain for people of color, immigrants, and other marginalized communities.
Some politicians and media outlets also contribute to this by dehumanizing and demonizing certain groups, portraying them as a threat to society and as weak and inferior. It is crucial to recognize and reject such forms of discrimination and hate speech, as they can lead to violence and harm towards marginalized groups.
11. Everybody is educated to become a hero. “In Ur-Fascist ideology, heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death.”
Fascists promote the idea of heroism and self-sacrifice for the greater good. This can be seen in the far-right’s idolization of figures who embody their ideals and are willing to take extreme actions in support of their cause.
The idea that everyone should be educated to become a hero is not only foundational to Fascism, it allows them to openly radicalize a population, as it promotes the idea that individuals should be willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good of the nation or group. This cult of heroism is often linked with a cult of death, as individuals are encouraged to embrace death in the service of their country or cause.
One historical example of this can be seen in Nazi Germany, where the idea of the “superior Aryan” was promoted and individuals were encouraged to sacrifice themselves for the nation through military service and acts of heroism. The Nazis also promoted the idea of a “heroic death” for soldiers and civilians alike, as a way to serve the greater good of the nation. In modern examples, we can see some people or groups who try to idolize the idea of sacrifice for their own political agenda, and try to manipulate the masses by promoting the idea of heroism and death for their own cause.
12. Machismo and weaponry. “Machismo implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.”
Fascists celebrate traditional gender roles and reject non-heteronormative identities and behaviors. This is evident in the far-right’s promotion of hypermasculinity and their opposition to LGBTQ+ rights.
In fascist regimes, women have typically been relegated to traditional roles in the home and family, and any deviation from traditional gender roles or expressions has been met with hostility. This is often linked to the celebration of “machismo” and militarism, with fascism valorizing physical strength, aggression, and the use of violence as a means to achieve political goals.
Historical examples of this can be seen in the Nazi regime’s promotion of traditional gender roles and persecution of LGBTQ+ individuals, or in the promotion of hypermasculinity in the fascist regimes of Italy and Spain. In modern times, the promotion of traditional gender roles and the denigration of marginalized groups, including women and LGBTQ+ individuals, can be seen in some far-right and alt-right movements.
13. Selective populism. “There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of the selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.”
Fascists use populist rhetoric to appeal to the masses, often through the use of emotional and simplistic messages. This can be seen in the far-right’s use of social media to spread their ideology and rally support.
Selective populism is not only another foundational principle. It is a powerful weapon Fascists use for the manipulation of public opinion and the creation of a false sense of consensus. In fascist regimes, the government controls the media and uses it to present a skewed version of reality, portraying the ruling party or leader as popular and beloved, while demonizing and marginalizing opposing voices. This creates a sense of unity among the population, and makes it difficult for dissenting voices to be heard. Historically, this has been seen in fascist regimes such as Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, where the media was strictly controlled and used to promote the ideologies and policies of the ruling party. In Nazi Germany, for example, the government controlled all forms of media, including newspapers, radio, and film, and used them to promote the Nazi party and its leader, Adolf Hitler.
In modern times, this concept of selective populism can be seen in the use of social media and other forms of digital media by populist leaders and movements. In many countries, leaders use social media to bypass traditional forms of media and directly connect with their followers, creating a sense of intimacy and closeness that is not always based on reality. This can be seen in the use of social media by leaders such as Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro, who used the platforms to promote their political agendas, while silencing dissenting voices. It is important to note that selective populism is not limited to fascist movements or regimes, and it can be seen in other forms of authoritarian and populist movements. It is important to be aware of the manipulation tactics used by governments, political parties and leaders to maintain power and control public opinion.
14. Ur-Fascism speaks Newspeak. “All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning
Fascists manipulate language to control thoughts and restrict independent thinking. This is evident in the far-right’s use of coded language and dog whistles, which allow them to communicate controversial ideas without facing widespread backlash.
In fascist regimes, the use of language is often simplified and controlled to minimize the public’s capacity to think critically and make distinctions. This aims to foster unity and suppress differing opinions.
A historical example of this can be seen in Nazi Germany, where the language was heavily monitored and censored. The Nazi regime devised a new vocabulary, known as “Germanization,” aimed at removing words of foreign origin and simplifying the German language to make it more accessible to the masses. In addition, they strictly censored the media, limiting individuals’ access to information and their ability to form their own opinions. In the modern context, this use of language control can be observed in various authoritarian regimes across the world. These governments control the media, restrict access to information, and simplify language to control the narrative and silence opposing viewpoints. They often resort to propaganda to manipulate public opinion and maintain their grip on power.
Fascism in the Modern World: Case Studies
After understanding the key characteristics of fascism, it becomes crucial to identify its manifestations in the modern world. Here are some case studies that illustrate the resurgence of fascist ideologies:
1. MAGA Movement in the United States: The “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) movement, currently led by former President Donald Trump, has been criticized for exhibiting characteristics of a fascist ideology. The movement’s emphasis on nationalistic purity, rejection of modernism, and the cult of action are reminiscent of the key characteristics of fascism. The MAGA movement’s rhetoric and actions, such as the storming of the U.S. Capitol, demonstrate a clear alignment with fascist ideologies. Furthermore, the MAGA movement has shown a willingness to collaborate with other far-right groups, both domestically and internationally, to further its agenda.
2. Far-Right Movements and Political Parties in Europe: Across Europe, far-right movements and political parties have gained traction, many of which exhibit fascist tendencies. These movements often exploit societal fears and prejudices to create a common enemy, typically immigrants and refugees. They also reject modern ideas and innovations, viewing them as corrupting influences. Notably, these movements have found common ground with the MAGA movement in the United States, sharing similar ideologies and often expressing support for each other.
3. QAnon Conspiracy Theory: The QAnon conspiracy theory, which alleges a secret plot against President Trump by a “deep state” of government officials, exhibits several characteristics of fascism. The theory promotes a narrative of conspiracy and intrigue, blames societal problems on a specific group, and views any opposition to the ideology as a threat. The widespread belief in this unfounded conspiracy theory demonstrates the power of misinformation and the potential for it to fuel fascist ideologies. Importantly, QAnon has become a global phenomenon, with followers in many countries, including those with active far-right movements.
By examining these case studies, we can gain a better understanding of how fascist ideologies have evolved and adapted to the modern world.
America elects Fascism
The Russian government’s attempt to help elect Donald Trump in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election is a well-documented matter that has been the subject of extensive investigation. In 2016, a number of individuals connected to the Russian government were found to have interfered in the U.S. election in an effort to help elect Trump. This interference included the dissemination of false information through social media and the hacking of Democratic National Committee emails.
Following his election, the Trump administration was found to have given favorable treatment to the Russian government. For example, Trump was criticized for his praise of Russian President Vladimir Putin and his repeated efforts to undermine the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia interfered in the election. Additionally, several individuals within the Trump administration, including former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and former Campaign Chairman Paul Manafort, were found to have had close ties to the Russian government.
Several individuals within the Trump administration have been charged with crimes since 2016. This includes former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, who pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI, and former Campaign Chairman Paul Manafort, who was convicted of tax and bank fraud.
There have also been connections between the Trump administration and white nationalist and extremist organizations. For example, several members of the Oath Keepers, a far-right extremist group, were found to have participated in the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 (source). Additionally, former Trump adviser Steve Bannon was a key figure in the Proud Boys, a far-right nationalist group.
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s annual report, they identified 733 active hate groups in the United States in 2021, down from the 838 counted in 2020 and the 940 counted in 2019 source. It’s important to note that these numbers fluctuate year by year, and the decrease does not necessarily indicate a reduction in hate-related activities or ideologies. In fact, certain groups like the Proud Boys have seen a surge in their chapters.
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) also provides data indicating that right-wing extremists were linked to at least 26 extremist-related murders in the United States in 2021 and have been responsible for 75 percent of such murders in the last ten years source.
These statistics underscore the prevalence and danger of far-right extremist and hate groups in the U.S. It’s crucial to remain vigilant and informed about these groups and their activities to counteract their harmful ideologies and protect democratic norms and institutions.
Other notable figures from the Trump administration who faced legal consequences include:
Steve Bannon, Trump’s political strategist, was charged with fraud in 2020 for a fundraising scam tied to raising dollars to build Trump’s border wall. The allegation was that he and others involved in the “We Build the Wall” group used money raised to pay for lavish personal expenses.
Tom Barrack, who chaired Trump’s inaugural committee and has been a longtime friend, was accused of illegal foreign lobbying on behalf of the United Arab Emirates in 2021.
Elliott Broidy, a top fundraiser for Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, pleaded guilty in 2020 to conducting a secret lobbying campaign in exchange for millions of dollars.
Rick Gates, deputy to the campaign chairman of Trump’s 2016 campaign, pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting Paul Manafort in concealing $75 million in foreign bank accounts. Gates turned informant for the government as part of the broader probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and was sentenced to 45 days in jail.
George Nader, an informal foreign policy adviser to Trump’s 2016 campaign, cooperated heavily with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election. In early 2020, he pleaded guilty to two counts of sex crimes involving minors.
George Papadopoulos, a relatively junior adviser to Trump’s campaign, was sentenced to 12 days in prison for lying to investigators about his contacts with individuals tied to Russia.
Roger Stone, a longtime adviser to Trump, was convicted in 2019 for lying to Congress and threatening a witness regarding his efforts for Trump’s campaign. Stone was found guilty of obstruction of a congressional investigation, five counts of making false statements to Congress, and tampering with a witness. All of the charges stemmed from Stone’s attempts to thwart the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Stone was pardoned by Trump in December 2020.
The Trump administration has been linked to various far-right organizations. For instance, there have been reports of connections between the Trump administration and the Proud Boys, a far-right nationalist group. A former top official in the Trump Department of Energy admitted to being a member of the Proud Boys and was found to have posted racist and sexist comments online.
Furthermore, Trump’s rhetoric has been linked to an increase in hate crimes and violence. A study found that counties where Trump held a campaign rally in 2016 saw a 226% increase in reported hate crimes over comparable counties that did not host such a rally.
The Oath Keepers, another far-right extremist group, were found to have participated in the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. Some members of the group have claimed they were working on orders from Trump, although this has not been substantiated.
The media also played a role in the spread of Trump’s message and policies. A number of media organizations, including Fox News, gave favorable coverage to Trump’s openly fascistic policies and talking points, which helped to spread his message to a wider audience. This favorable coverage contributed to a distorted perspective of the actual evidence of the crimes and immoral actions committed by the Trump campaign and administration, as well as their lies and deceptions during his term
These events ultimately led to Trump’s impeachment for withholding military aid from Ukraine in exchange for political favors, and his subsequent attempt to remain in power after losing the 2020 election, which culminated in the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeline of Trump’s presidency highlights the dangers of media manipulation, the corrupting influence of foreign interference in democratic processes, and the importance of holding elected officials accountable for their actions.”
The Beer Hall Putsch in Nazi Germany and the MAGA attack on the US Capitol share similarities in their use of public displays of violence to enforce public conformity and promote the ideologies of the respective movements. Both events were intended to manipulate the public and undermine democratic processes.
The attack on the US Capitol, carried out by supporters of former President Donald Trump, was a direct result of his efforts to manipulate the American people and subvert the electoral process. Similarly, the Beer Hall Putsch, led by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, aimed to overthrow the government and establish a fascist regime. Both events sought to create a sense of crisis and chaos, with the aim of justifying increased government control and suppression of dissent. The intent was to mobilize the public towards a specific ideology, using violence as a means to achieve compliance and intimidate opposition.
The connection between Trump and Putin further highlights the similarities between the current state of the United States and modern Russia. Both leaders have employed tactics to consolidate power, suppress dissent, and promote a particular version of nationalism intertwined with religion. This alignment echoes the strategies employed by fascist movements, which seek to create a homogenous society based on a specific ideology.
By drawing parallels between the Beer Hall Putsch and the MAGA attack, we can better understand the dangers of unchecked authoritarianism and the need for vigilance against the spread of fascist ideologies. It is important to recognize that while not all individuals or groups within the movement subscribe to all fascist beliefs, the movement as a whole has demonstrated fascist tendencies.
These events ultimately led to Trump’s impeachment for withholding military aid from Ukraine in exchange for political favors, and his subsequent attempt to remain in power after losing the 2020 election, which culminated in the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. The events of this period highlight the dangers of media manipulation, the corrupting influence of foreign interference in democratic processes, and the importance of holding elected officials accountable for their actions.
The inaction and lack of accountability allowed a president who cheated his way into the office, corrupted the country’s perspective on fascism so horribly and how this all culminated in him using the United States Government as a personal leverage point to get fabricated information out of another country’s leader. The parallels between the Beer Hall Putsch and the MAGA attack serve as a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked authoritarianism and the importance of holding elected officials accountable for their actions.”
It is worth noting that it is not a monolithic entity. There are certainly individuals and groups within the movement that do not subscribe to all of these beliefs. However, the movement as a whole has been shown to be unabashedly fascistic.
Now that we have covered the evil that presents itself through fascism, we must cover the inevitable byproduct of fascist ideology and action. I will now spend a short time on each stage to elaborate further upon our current events. As I do so, please keep in mind that each stage is itself a process of associated and collective actions.
Genocide
The journey towards genocidal acts is not a straightforward one. It can unfold in various forms and at different times. Currently, the moral panic surrounding the transgender community is a complex issue, influenced by a multitude of factors such as political beliefs, religious doctrines, and societal views on gender identity.
A significant instigator of this panic is the conservative media landscape, which often portrays transgender individuals as societal threats through misleading and stereotypical narratives. This portrayal perpetuates harmful misconceptions about the transgender community, fueling fear and prejudice. Conservative politicians and advocates frequently exploit trans rights issues for political gain, using them to rally their base and secure support.
The conservative media and political figures create an echo chamber, reinforcing each other’s opinions and messages. This leads to an imbalanced representation of conservative views in the media, creating a distorted perception of reality and amplifying conservative ideologies. However, it’s crucial to recognize that this phenomenon of moral panic against transgender people extends beyond the conservative media echo chamber, permeating other forms of media and cultural attitudes.
Addressing this issue effectively requires sensitivity and empathy, giving a platform to the experiences and perspectives of the transgender community. By doing so, we can foster a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the situation.
Conservative ideology is a broad term that encompasses various beliefs, such as limited government, free-market capitalism, and traditional social norms. However, some factions within the conservative movement hold more extreme views, including a rejection of democratic norms and institutions, and the use of divisive and inflammatory language and tactics.
Fascism, a political ideology that emerged in the early 20th century, is characterized by extreme nationalism, authoritarianism, and a belief in the superiority of one’s own race or nation. Fascists typically reject liberal democracy and advocate for a strong leader and centralized government. Fascism has been associated with genocide in the past, as fascist governments have often targeted minority groups as scapegoats for the problems facing their nation.
It’s important to emphasize that not all conservatives, Republicans, or right-wing ideologies are inherently fascist or genocidal. However, there is a historical and ongoing connection between fascism and conservative ideologies. It’s essential to be aware of the potential dangers of extremist views, particularly when they are used to justify violence or discrimination against marginalized groups. To combat this, we must critically examine and challenge the language, ideas, and actions of those who hold such extremist views, and promote and protect democratic norms and institutions.
In the last few years, there have been increased efforts, both in legislation and rhetoric, aimed at denying the existence and rights of the transgender community. This is done through the dissemination of damaging stereotypes and misinformation, as well as the implementation of laws and policies that limit their access to essential services such as healthcare, education, and more.
These actions must be recognized for what they are: a systematic attempt to dehumanize the transgender community. For example, there have been numerous state-level legislative efforts in the United States to restrict transgender individuals’ access to healthcare, including attempts to ban transgender youth from receiving gender-affirming care.
There is also a rise of anti-trans rhetoric on the internet, particularly on social media platforms, where misinformation and hate speech targeting the transgender community is often allowed to flourish. This can lead to a reinforcement of harmful stereotypes and attitudes, as well as a normalization of discrimination and violence against these people.
All these efforts, whether legislative or rhetorical, contribute to the dehumanization of transgender individuals and create an environment in which violence and discrimination against them is more likely to occur. The result is a dangerous and dehumanizing environment for transgender individuals that can lead to serious harm, including the risk of genocide.
It’s important to note that recognizing the rights and humanity of transgender individuals is not only a moral imperative, but also a legal one. All individuals have the right to be treated with dignity and respect, and to be protected from discrimination and violence under international human rights laws. In the face of this, society at large must take a stand against all forms of hate speech, discrimination, and violence targeted at marginalized groups, regardless of political beliefs. This includes speaking out against and holding accountable those who participate in or incite such actions.
- Classification: The first stage of genocide, where societies are divided into an “us vs them” dichotomy. In the context of the transgender community, this tactic has been used throughout history to justify discrimination and violence against this marginalized group. By labeling and scapegoating transgender individuals and the larger LGBTQ+ community as “outsiders” or “anti-American,” while those in power can create a narrative that denies these individuals’ rights and humanity.
This is often achieved through the use of discriminatory language and rhetoric that dehumanizes transgender individuals and portrays them as a societal threat or a social contagion. This can include using derogatory terms and slurs, spreading misinformation and stereotypes, and painting transgender individuals as deluded, mentally ill, or deviant. Another method of classification is the passing of legislation and policies that restrict the rights and access to basic necessities of transgender individuals. This can include laws that restrict access to healthcare, education, employment, and housing, as well as laws that criminalize transgender individuals for simply existing.
By creating a narrative in which transgender individuals are seen as “other” or “less-than,” it becomes easier for those in power to deny them their basic human rights, and to justify discrimination and violence against them. This is not only morally wrong but it is also illegal under international human rights laws.
It’s important for society to recognize and reject these tactics, and to stand in solidarity with the transgender community. All individuals have the right to be treated with dignity and respect, and to be protected from discrimination and violence, regardless of their gender identity. - Symbolization : This refers to another way in which an “us vs them” environment is created. In the context of the treatment of transgender individuals, symbolization refers to the use of symbols, imagery, and language to stereotype and marginalize the transgender community. This can include using derogatory terms, slurs, and stereotypes to depict transgender individuals as deviant, dangerous or inferior. Fascists have historically used symbolization as a tool to dehumanize and justify violence against marginalized groups. For example, in Nazi Germany, Jews were depicted as subhuman and a threat to the nation, through the use of anti-Semitic imagery and language. Similarly, in other fascist regimes, minority groups have been depicted as inferior and a threat to the nation through the use of discriminatory language and imagery. There are similarities and parallels between the way that fascist regimes have used symbolization in the past and the way that it is used against transgender individuals by some factions of the modern American Republican party and the conservative movement.It’s important to recognize and reject these tactics, as they contribute to the dehumanization of transgender individuals and create an environment in which discrimination and violence against them is more likely to occur. To combat this it is vitally essential to call out and condemn any use of discriminatory language and imagery, and to advocate for the rights and dignity of transgender individuals.
- Discrimination : Discrimination against transgender people can take many forms, from subtle acts of prejudice to overt acts of violence. One example is the discrimination faced by transgender athletes in sports. Many states have passed laws that prohibit transgender girls and women from competing on sports teams that align with their gender identity. This discrimination is based on the false idea that transgender girls and women have an unfair advantage over cisgender girls and women, despite evidence to the contrary. This not only denies transgender athletes the opportunity to participate in sports but also reinforces harmful stereotypes about these people. Another example is discrimination faced by transgender people in public restrooms. Many states have passed laws that restrict transgender people from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity, putting them at risk of harassment and violence. This discrimination is based on the false idea that transgender people are a threat to cisgender people in bathrooms, despite evidence to the contrary. Discrimination against transgender people also extends to employment, housing, education, healthcare, and many other areas of life. The lack of legal protections for transgender individuals leaves them vulnerable to discrimination in these areas. The ideology behind these discriminatory practices is rooted in the belief that transgender individuals are less than human and therefore do not deserve the same rights and protections as cisgender people. Charismatic leaders in some political movements are often used to express a collective resentment towards transgender individuals, using fictionalized narratives to justify their victimization. These leaders exploit the fear and ignorance of their followers to gain power and push discriminatory legislation and policies. This contributes to the dehumanization and creates an environment in which discrimination and violence against them is more likely to occur. To combat this we must raise awareness and speak out against these discriminatory practices and ideologies, in order to protect the rights and dignity of all individuals. Discrimination in any form is morally and legally wrong, and it is the responsibility of society to ensure that all individuals are treated with dignity and respect.
- Dehumanization : Dehumanization is the process of portraying a group of people as less than human in order to justify discrimination, violence, or other forms of harm against them. It is a key aspect of genocidal intent, as it makes it easier for people to commit atrocities against the targeted group. In the context of transgender individuals, dehumanization often takes the form of using derogatory language, slurs, and stereotypes to depict them as deviant, dangerous, or inferior. This can include referring to transgender individuals as a “contagion,” “disease,” “vermin,” “plague,” “insects,” or “animals.” This type of language serves to dehumanize transgender individuals and make it easier for people to justify discrimination and violence against them. Propaganda is also a key tool in the dehumanization process. It can take many forms, such as articles, videos, speeches, and social media posts, and is used to spread misinformation and stereotypes about transgender people and transgender care. The goal of this propaganda is to vilify transgender people and teach people to treat them as less than human. The prime examples of modern propaganda mills that spread this dehumanization include but are not limited to Info Wars, The Daily Wire, Prager U, Fox News, Stephen Crowder, Joe Rogan, Tim Pool, and Elon Musk. When people begin to believe that the targeted group is a threat or less than human, it becomes easier for them to justify discrimination and violence against that group. Phrases like “we’re better off without them” or “they don’t exist” are examples of dehumanizing rhetoric that can lead to harmful actions. It’s important to recognize and reject these tactics.
- Organization : It is important to recognize that discrimination and violence against transgender individuals is not just the actions of a few isolated people, but rather the result of organized efforts by various groups and people. Genocides are always organized, and in the past, they have often been carried out by the state or with the support of state actors. However, non-state actors, such as militias and terrorist groups, have also been used to carry out genocidal acts. Along with the use of large media campaigns to deny responsibility are common among these ideologies as well. Today, we can see organized efforts to discriminate against and harm transgender individuals in various hate movements. The Proud Boys and The Oath Keepers are examples of such groups, but there are at least 65 other known and tracked hate movements targeting LGBT groups. These groups are often connected to larger networks and ideologies that promote discrimination and violence against marginalized groups. International conflicts have also been used as opportunities to facilitate genocidal acts. The trafficking of weapons and escalation of violence and murder rates can be used as a distraction from discriminatory and violent actions against transgender individuals. It’s important to recognize these patterns and to hold those who are responsible accountable for their actions. It is also important to recognize that these efforts are not just isolated to America, but rather a global phenomenon. Hate movements and discriminatory ideologies exist in many countries and regions, and it is important to be aware of and to speak out against them. It is imperative to protect the rights and dignity of all people, and to ensure that those who are responsible for discrimination and violence are held accountable.
- Polarization : This is the process of driving groups of people apart in order to weaken their ability to resist discrimination or violence. This can be done through laws, decrees, or other forms of government action that restrict the rights and freedoms of certain groups. This can also be done through the actions of non-state actors, such as hate groups, that use propaganda and violence to target and divide communities. In the context of transgender individuals, polarization can take the form of laws or policies that restrict their rights and access to services, such as bathroom bills or laws that restrict access to healthcare. It can also take the form of hate speech and violence that is used to target and marginalize transgender people. It is important to note that polarization can also occur within political parties, as extremists may target moderate members for removal in order to consolidate their power. This is particularly relevant in the current political climate, where there has been a sharp increase in divisive rhetoric and violence. The media also plays a role in polarization, as certain outlets may spread misinformation and promote extremist ideologies. The language used by conservative pundits has become increasingly divisive and inflammatory in recent years, particularly since 2016. This has contributed to a further increase in polarization in the United States. It is important to recognize that polarization is not a natural phenomenon, but rather the result of intentional efforts to divide and weaken communities.
- Preparation : This is the stage of genocide when the perpetrators plan and organize the systematic extermination of a targeted group. This can involve the use of various forms of propaganda to dehumanize and vilify the targeted group, as well as the development of policies and practices that will facilitate their extermination. In the context of transgender people, the Preparation stage can be seen in the actions of individuals and organizations that spread hate speech and misinformation with the goal of inciting violence against them. This can include the use of language that dehumanizes transgender individuals, such as referring to them as “disease” or “vermin.” In the United States, some of the individuals and organizations that have been identified as promoting hate speech and violence against transgender individuals include Matt Walsh, The Daily Wire, Fox News, Republican Governors, Congressmen, Senators, Presidential Candidates and One former President. It is important to note that the use of hateful language and rhetoric can lead to real-world violence against transgender people. Studies have shown a correlation between hate speech and acts of violence against marginalized communities. The focus on spreading hate speech and misinformation is intentional and is being used to justify further escalation of violence against transgender individuals. It is important to recognize that the Preparation stage of genocide is not a passive process but an active one that requires the participation of individuals and organizations to spread hate speech and misinformation, and to plan and organize violence against transgender people. The only known way to combat this is through raising awareness.
- Persecution : The Persecution phase of a genocide refers to the actions and behaviors of the perpetrators towards the targeted group that are intended to weaken and isolate them. This can include discriminatory laws and policies, economic exploitation, physical violence, and children will be forcibly taken from their parents. The ultimate goal of persecution is to make the targeted group vulnerable to extermination. Historical examples of the Persecution phase of genocide include the Armenian Genocide, where Ottoman Turkish authorities passed laws aimed at confiscating Armenian property and limiting their economic opportunities, and the Holocaust, where Jews in Nazi Germany were subjected to discriminatory laws, had their businesses and homes confiscated, and were physically isolated in ghettos. Modern examples of persecution can be seen in the Rohingya Genocide in Myanmar, where the Rohingya minority have been subjected to widespread violence and forced to live in squalid, cramped camps, and in the ongoing conflict in Darfur, Sudan, where the Sudanese government has used a combination of bombing and ground attacks to displace and weaken Darfuri communities. It is important to note that the Persecution phase is often the precursor to mass violence and extermination, and can be a warning sign for impending genocide. It is crucial for the international community to recognize and respond to persecution in order to prevent the escalation of violence and loss of life.
- Extermination : This vile and brutal phase of a genocide is characterized by widespread, systematic, and intentional violence against a targeted group of people. This phase is characterized by acts of murder, massacre, and other forms of lethal violence. During this stage, the goal is to physically eliminate as many members of the targeted group as possible. One of the most well-known examples of extermination in the modern era is the Holocaust, in which Nazi Germany systematically murdered six million Jews, as well as other minority groups, during World War II. In the Rwandan genocide of 1994, members of the Hutu majority targeted members of the Tutsi minority, leading to the deaths of approximately 800,000 Tutsi people. In recent times, the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar, in which the country’s military and extremist groups targeted the Rohingya Muslim minority, leading to the killing of thousands and the forced displacement of hundreds of thousands more. It is important to note that the extermination phase of a genocide is the final stage of a process that often begins with stages of dehumanization, propaganda, discrimination, and persecution. The international community must work to prevent and address these early stages in order to prevent the escalation to mass violence.
- Denial : There is nothing the fascist MAGA movement embodies more, than an ever present anti-intellectualism, denialism, deflection, obfuscation, and gaslighting, this is the glue that binds them together in their combined hatred of their perceived others. They will attempt to convince you that no one can know anything for certain, therefore their answers must be as good as their opposition, the barrier is claimed to be their targeted group’s inability to see the truth. They will never accept blame for the open actions they have taken, instead they will often blame the very victims they attack for being the cause of their own suffering. Throughout the genocide and even after great efforts will be made to downplay the severity through euphemisms. Perpetrators will fight to block investigations, fight to retain power until driven out by force. At which point they will flee to escape accountability. The goal of the denial phase is to deflect responsibility and discredit survivors and witnesses, in order to avoid legal or moral consequences for the perpetrators. One historical example of the denial phase is the Armenian Genocide, which took place during World War I. The Ottoman government organized the systematic extermination of 1.5 million Armenians, but after the war, the new Turkish government denied that a genocide had taken place, and went to great lengths to erase evidence of the crime. For many years, the Turkish government refused to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, and even today, it remains a sensitive issue in Turkish society. Another example is the Rwandan Genocide of 1994, in which more than 800,000 Tutsis were murdered by members of the Hutu majority. After the genocide, the Rwandan Patriotic Front took power and a new government was established. Despite overwhelming evidence of the genocide, many members of the former regime, as well as their allies in neighboring countries, sought to deny that a genocide had taken place. In some cases, they even went as far as to claim that the Tutsis were the ones committing the violence, or that the numbers of victims were greatly exaggerated. More recently, in the aftermath of the genocide in Bosnia-Herzegovina during the 1990s, the government of Serbia and the Serbian media engaged in a campaign of denial and propaganda, aimed at obscuring the role of the Serbian military and paramilitary units in the mass killing of Bosnian Muslims. The Serbian government also sought to discredit the work of international war crimes tribunals and human rights organizations, which were documenting the evidence of the genocide. These are just a few examples of how the denial phase of a genocide can manifest, and how it can serve as a tool for perpetuating the legacy of mass violence and avoiding accountability.
In conclusion, it is important to understand the underlying ideology and patterns of behavior of fascist movements, as well as the stages of a genocide, in order to recognize and resist them. The MAGA movement in America embodies all of the core tenets of fascism, as outlined in Umberto Eco’s definition, including the rejection of modernism, the cult of action, the belief that disagreement is treason, fear of difference, appeal to social frustration, obsession with a plot, the portrayal of the enemy as both strong and weak, the belief that pacifism is trafficking with the enemy, contempt for the weak, the notion that everyone should be educated to become a hero, machismo and weaponry, selective populism, and the use of Newspeak. These dangerous ideologies can lead to the persecution and extermination of those who are deemed “different” or “less than.” It is imperative that we remain vigilant and actively resist any movement that seeks to restrict our freedoms and undermine our democracy. By recognizing and speaking out against the signs of fascism and genocide, we can work to protect the most vulnerable members of our society and ensure a future that is just and equitable for all.
We cannot fight something we cannot understand or name. But, throughout history one of the most important factors in determining whether or not something seems to be classified as a genocide, is in great part, due to the intent behind the actions taken. If there is one thing here I don’t think I need to extol upon further, is the intent, that they have been screaming for years at this point.
“We’re better off without them.”
This mentality is the powerful poison that drives these kind of evil actions. We can see it happening, yet so many seem afraid to call it what it is. So I will leave you with a poem that students of history should remember, hopefully after all this you can understand its relevance today.
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
[First They Came by Pastor Martin Niemoller]
(P.S.)
After publishing this article, I delved deeper into the ideological underpinnings of contemporary fascists and was alarmed to uncover what can be likened to a modern-day ‘final solution’ documentation. This chilling discovery is not a mere hyperbolic comparison but a stark reflection of the dangerous trajectory some factions are taking. The parallels between the historical atrocities and the contemporary documentation are uncanny. Both are rooted in the dehumanization of specific groups, the propagation of hate, and the desire for unchecked power. The very essence of the ‘final solution’ was the systematic extermination of a group based on misguided beliefs and prejudices. Today’s documentation, while perhaps more covert, echoes similar sentiments. It is imperative for us to recognize these patterns, not as a mere academic exercise, but as a call to action. Drawing this comparison is not only apt but accurate, as history has a way of repeating itself when its lessons are ignored.
- Nationalism: The Mandate for Leadership emphasizes a strong national identity and the importance of American values. If this emphasis excludes or demonizes other cultures or identities, it could be seen as promoting a form of nationalism that is characteristic of fascist ideologies.
- Victimhood: If the Mandate portrays conservatives or their values as being under threat or victimized by external forces, this could align with the fascist tactic of rallying people around a perceived common enemy.
- Disdain for Human Rights: If the Mandate advocates for policies that infringe on individual rights or promotes the idea that certain rights should be limited for the greater good, this would be in line with fascist ideologies that prioritize the state over individual freedoms.
- Identification of Enemies as a Unifying Cause: Fascist ideologies often rally their followers against a common enemy. If the Mandate identifies specific groups or ideologies as threats to conservative values, it could be using this tactic.
- Supremacy of the Military: A strong emphasis on military power and the need for a robust defense can be a sign of fascist leanings. If the Mandate prioritizes military spending or advocates for aggressive foreign policies, it could be seen as promoting this aspect of fascism.
- Rampant Sexism: If the Mandate promotes traditional gender roles or seeks to limit the rights of women or LGBTQ+ individuals, it would align with the sexist tendencies of fascist ideologies.
- Controlled Mass Media: Advocating for control over media or portraying mainstream media as “the enemy” would be in line with fascist tactics of controlling the narrative and suppressing dissenting voices.
- Obsession with National Security: An overemphasis on national security at the expense of individual freedoms could be seen as a sign of fascist leanings.
- Religion and Government Intertwined: If the Mandate promotes the idea that the U.S. is a Christian nation and that government policies should reflect Christian values, it would be promoting the intertwining of religion and government, a characteristic of some fascist regimes.
- Corporate Power Protected: Prioritizing corporate interests over individual rights or the environment could be seen as aligning with fascist ideologies that protect the interests of the elite.
- Labor Power Suppressed: If the Mandate advocates for policies that limit the rights of workers or weaken labor unions, it would be in line with fascist tendencies to suppress labor movements.
- Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts: A disregard for intellectualism or the arts, or portraying them as elitist, could be seen as a sign of fascist leanings.
- Obsession with Crime and Punishment: Advocating for harsher punishments or portraying certain groups as inherently criminal would align with fascist ideologies that use crime as a way to rally support and justify authoritarian measures.
- Rampant Cronyism and Corruption: If the Mandate promotes policies that favor a select group of elites or shows signs of corruption, it would be in line with the cronyism often seen in fascist regimes.
- Fraudulent Elections: Any indication that the Mandate supports suppressing votes, gerrymandering, or other tactics to influence election outcomes would be a sign of fascist tendencies.
