The war of transmission

Willson
Willson
Nov 3 · 7 min read

Back in the time, distinguishing gearboxes was easy; they were either manual or automatic. Manual and automatic are inherently different in structure. The video below would perfectly show the key differences. In general, manual is cheaper, lighter and more efficient, while automatic is easier and more convenient to drive.

For race cars and sports cars, manual is the best solution due to its efficiency. The only problem with stick-shift manual is that it takes more effort to maneuver. To make shifting easier, sequential manual was introduced firstly to race cars and gradually to street cars. It can be shifted using the gear lever with “+” and “-” or the shift paddles on steering wheel . This kind of manual gearboxes has no clutch pedal and often comes with automatic mode, so it is also called semi-automatic. Its structure still resembles that of traditional manual, though.

The 1989 Ferrari 640 was the first F1 car to have paddle shifting (of course F1 cars have no automatic mode). We see F1 drivers today easily shift down three gears before entering a turn thanks to the paddle shifting and computer assistance. Shift paddles are almost a standard equipment for luxury and sports cars now regardless of the actual transmission type, while the traditional three-pedal stick-shift is continuously declining in sales.

Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash

If the manual-based transmissions is more efficient and could shift automatically with the assistance of computer, what is the reason for using automatic? The key is the clutch itself. First, the clutch is disengaged and then re-engaged in every gear shift, and this creates the power discrepancy and the bumping push. For those semi-automatic gearboxes, this process is conducted by the computer. Second, whenever a manual car stops, the clutch has to be disengaged from the engine and re-engaged when starts again. This means manual cars are not suitable for crawling in the heavy traffic, which is a common situation in metropolitan area. Some drive the manual cars with clutch half-engaged when crawling, but the clutch will soon be worn out.

Photo by Dennis Eusebio on Unsplash

Automatic transmission, on the other hand, fits better in urban traffic. Here I refer to any gearbox with a torque converter and planetary gears as automatic even if it has manual mode. The torque converter allows different turning speed on both sides, so the whole drive train can be still while the engine is running. Upon a gear shift, the torque converter does not need to be disengaged, so the power transmitting is smooth and continuous. Drivers are thus allowed to use “D” gear all the time. Automatic car drivers (like me) can simply use the brake pedal to control the car in the crazy (Asian) traffic: release the brake to let the car crawl; hit the brake to stop; hit the gas pedal only when needed.

The biggest problem for automatic was its efficiency because of the inevitable power loss through the hydraulic system of the torque converter. In the past, the manual version of a model was always faster than its automatic counterpart. Modern torque-converter automatic, however, has significantly improved and are often faster than the manual counterpart. The high performance automatic transmission will be further introduced later on.

Photo by Valdemars Magone on Unsplash

Some prominent manufacturers, including Audi, BMW and Mercedes, produced only longitudinal engine layout in the past. Transverse engine placement was considered a cheap solution to small cars and never regarded as a luxury car layout. In recent years, the transverse layout gains its way into premium market due to the cost concern and technology progress. Volvo has been using this for more than two decades, and even the once RWD-only BMW joins the transverse-FF competition. The gearboxes for transverse vehicles are totally different from the longitudinal ones, and those luxury brands usually source the transverse automatic from outside suppliers. In fact, they source almost from one supplier only.

The AISIN AWF8F Series almost monopolizes the transverse automatic market. From BMW, Volvo to Peugeot, the 8-speed auto from Japanese firm can be seen on various transverse models worldwide. Rumor has it that AISIN holds many patents in this realm, so the competing products remain limited. ZF produces the superior 8HP, but its transverse 9HP is not a reputable product. The only notable user of 9HP is Jaguar Land Rover.

This triggers the war of transmission. To break through the monopoly of AISIN, various manufacturers come up with different ideas. The most notable one is Volkswagen AG (VAG), who has been using dual-clutch transmission (DCT) as an alternative solution to transverse torque-converter automatic since the 21st century. Following the step of VAG, major European firms also resort to DCT as the full or partial solution to transverse transmission. Notable suppliers of transverse DCT include BorgWarner and Getrag (renamed Magna PT after the merger). Currently BMW uses both AISIN auto and Getrag DCT in UKL models, and Mercedes uses its own-developed 7G/8G-DCT together with the outsourced Getrag DCT (for the 1.33L engine) in MFA models. The video below shows the basic mechanism of DCT.

The DCT is structurally closer to traditional manual than automatic. The driving logic should thus be similar to that of semi-automatic (or sequential manual) due to the absence of torque converter. This actually leads to a serious problem as most DCTs are marketed as “automatic”. In fact, VW offers only DCT (branded as DSG) and manual for its MQB family, so customers naturally assume that DCT is the automatic counterpart of manual transmission. To force the DCT to behave like an automatic, some weird logic is introduced. For example, the DSG from VW launches from 2nd gear with the clutch half-engaged to avoid the bumping push, and this accelerates the wearing of clutches. Failure of DCT from various brands is always a hot debate all around the world. This does not mean DCTs are bad. They are just applied in a wrong way.

Another solution to the transverse automatic is continuously variable transmission (CVT). The most notable user and supplier of CVT should be NISSAN and JATCO respectively. All the transverse NISSAN models are equipped with CVT now, compatible up to its VQ35DE engine. CVT is subject to sustainability issue since its debut in 1990s, but currently the problem is not as heated as that of DCT.

The war of high performance longitudinal transmission is as fierce as that of transverse city cars. Torque converter was never welcomed in this class, and the war started from optimizing the manual gearboxes. Ferrari started applying sequential manual “F1-gearbox” on road cars in 1990s, so did BMW, debuting the SMG in E36 M3. The only exception was the Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren, which used a traditional 5-speed automatic. In the second decade of 21st century, longitudinal DCT gained popularity among the class. Audi, BMW, Ferrari, Mercedes and Porsche are all in the game, and notable suppliers of longitudinal DCT include Getrag and ZF. The PDK from Porsche is one of the most notable application. Supplied by ZF, PDK can sustain 50 consecutive launching as claimed by Porsche. PDK is also applied on Bentley Continental and Flying Spur now.

The progress of automatic transmission makes the torque converter a feasible option for performance vehicles now. Take the famous ZF 8HP for example. The torque converter of 8HP can be locked-up to avoid any power loss at high speed. 8HP sustains higher torque than some DCTs and is especially suitable for high-torque turbocharged sports sedans and GTs. It can now be seen on BMW M models, Alfa Romeo Quadrifoglio, Maserati, Jaguar and Land Rover, Aston Martin etc.

Mercedes-AMG takes a step further. In its SPEEDSHIFT MCT gearbox, the torque converter is replaced by a set of multi-clutch disk. That makes it a hybrid-transmission between manual and automatic, as shown in the clip. This gearbox is available on selected V8 AMG models.

One has to know that every type of transmission has different specifications catering to different engine output. A CVT for high output is still stronger than a tradition automatic for low output. We saw many cases of DCT failure, but that does not mean PDK is bad just because it is also a DCT.

What is the future for the car transmission? Stick-shift manual will definitely remain as a low-price solution to city cars and commercial vehicles, with occasional application in some sports car (e.g. Porsche 911 R). Automatic will become a standard equipment for luxury models, whereas some entry-level luxury models may stick to transverse DCT. Longitudinal DCT will definitely be the best solution to street-legal super cars.

As we step into the electric era, hybrid power is changing the transmission industry. Some suppliers are offering hybrid transmission solution as they combine an electric motor to a gearbox. Both PDK and 8HP from ZF can now be mounted with a electric motor. Whilst most electric cars only need single-speed gearbox due to the continuous output of electric motor, Porsche Taycan shows the possibility of a more complicated gearbox layout as it has a single-speed gearbox on front axle and a two-speed on rear.

The war of transmission in electric era is just about to kick off.

Photo by David von Diemar on Unsplash
Willson

Written by

Willson

AutoMurmur

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade