Perry’s probably right. “Global Warming” scientists have falsified data in the past to conform to a political agenda. That’s one reason they have less credibility now. They may be right. They may be wrong. But one thing we know for certain: They do not have a working model to explain what’s happening with the earth’s climate. If they did, they would be able to accurately predict global climate changes… and they can’t. Despite Algore’s predictions, the arctic is NOT “ice-free”. Our coastal cities are NOT underwater. We have NOT had “super-storms” over the past decade. All failures in prediction that indicate that those making these claims (morons like Franken and Algore) don’t have a clue what they’re talking about.
Could they be right? Yes. Could they be wrong? Yes. Should we flip a coin? It would make more sense than blindly believing Franken and the rest of the climate change agenda.