Barry Davis
Aug 26, 2017 · 1 min read

After reading your essay I have some questions/concerns….is the article an explaination of tolerance and how it relates to group survival or as some may interpret as a vague guide as to rules of engagement and the proportionate use of violence when groups with opposing ideologies come into contact….and tolerance cannot be viewed by either side as an option. I tend to agree more with Mr. Clancy’s rebuttal that at least in this instance all groups are obligated to follow the rules set by the state…a “One ring to rule them all”…..without the greater rule of law applying equally to all groups we risk the freedoms in place for differing groups to have a voice to one where the state will be the only voice…your thoughts?

)