That is exactly what this branch does.
Wouter In t Velt

Agreed! I wrote my comment because you also give a “better solution”. And this is not always a “better solution”. If your InfoMessage depends on the username being already updated, you need to split the two update functions like you have shown and the “better solution” does not work. That was the point of my comment. My apologies if that wasn’t clear.

Show your support

Clapping shows how much you appreciated Berry Groenendijk’s story.