Why Buy Music? An Artist’s Perspective.

Black Knoll Studio
5 min readMay 14, 2017

--

When you buy music, you are directly supporting the work of artists you enjoy. Buying music sends the right message to the record labels, music distribution channels, local record stores, and concert promoters: there is a desire and market (yes, we live in a capitalist system) for our art. This in turn, hopefully, will assure that we are able to record/release another album or play live shows.

There is no substitute for holding a record in your hands. Opening a package, putting an album on a record, cassette or CD player, seeing (and appreciating) the entire artwork, reading the lyrics’ sheet or liner notes; all while devoting our full attention to the music— it’s a listening ritual for many of us.

Unlike (poorly-encoded may I add) digital files, a physical medium creates an emblem in your living space: it reflects your taste and personality, just like pieces of furniture and art contribute to the interior design aesthetic of the place you call home. Every time you walk by your record collection, it brings back memories of what you were doing (and perhaps who were you with) when you acquired your albums. It also reminds you to listen to them. How many music files are buried on your hard drive, never to be played more than once?

For many listeners the convenience of digital music is important. Therefore, grabbing a hi-quality digital version (wav/aiff/flac/lossless) copy of an album is the way to go. Most physical releases actually come with a download code. High-resolution music files tend to be hard to find among the P2P communities or so-called “locker sites.” Streaming services and platforms like YouTube may offer high-resolution (is we can call 320kbps “hgih-res”) but this access to high-res is also entirely dependent on your ISP’s bandwidth. Ever heard of throttling? Think of how many times you’ve been watching pixelated content on Netflix or other streaming services. It’s the same principle with audio: quality will go down all the way to 96kbps (that’s not even suitable for human consumption!), depending on traffic/volume/isp or even your internet connection. After spending so much time/energy/money to craft an album, you and the artist creating the music both deserve better.

That leaves us all with streaming services like Spotify, Apple Music, and many others. Not only they pay the artists extremely poorly, but it has change the way we listen to music these days. Algorithmic playlists do not take into account the music’s context and place in the world. They are no substitute to curating and owning your private collection of music. One thing I really appreciated while growing up and discovering music was the fact that I had only so many records. I didn’t have much money, so my collection was fairly small (but potent). I would hang on to an album for a very long time and listen more frequently, as opposed to jumping from one track to the next track or randomly letting an algorithm dictate what I’m supposed to listen to next. Because of these limitations (and lack of access to immediate information like we do today), I developed fond memories of music I listened to and how it related to events in my own life. Having limited access to music made the albums in my collection really special. Music wasn’t disposable. I remember putting on records I disliked (or even hated) on first listen, only to start enjoying them after listening some more. Eventually some of those records became my favorite pieces of music.

What’s the point of subscribing to a service and having access to millions of songs to only listen to a very small percentage of those on a regular basis? Why would you conform to what is trending on playlists or what the algorithm thinks you should be listening to next? These are all very legitimate questions that every listener should ask themselves.

During my record buying lifetime, I have gone thru several copies of My Bloody Valentine’s “Loveless” for example — the original cassette version I bought got played until it was literally eaten by the tape deck. I’ve had some CD’s played so many times, the coating material pealed off (maybe this is how an artist like Oval got their original prepared CD idea, who knows!). All of these examples tend to create fond memories (at least to me) of music I love. Could we say the same thing about streaming services?

Simply put: when you buy music and you own your collection, you appreciate it much more.

Not all file-sharing is created equal. Sharing an album with a close group of friends, exchanging music as either mixtapes, burned CD’s or music files is similar how we all traded cassette tapes growing up in the 80’s and 90’s. To me that is totally benign and a great way to spread culture. I’ve gotten many emails from people in remote places where my music is not easily available (or in some cases outright prohibited), and it warms my heart to know it forms part of a soundrack to social changes happening. It is however, an entirely different thing to post an album by an artist (with buzz or otherwise known) to a blog/website in order to generate revenue on the Google Adwords income it’ll generate from all the online traffic hits. The latter is profiting off the hard work of others. It is explotaitive, digital colonialism at its worst.

I do not believe we need draconian new laws or even outright censorship. All we need, as artists creating music, is listeners that support what we do by buying our records, going to our shows, and telling their friends/peers to do the same. We do this already with other things we enjoy: we buy books, we pay to see films, we buy coffee, tea, alcohol, hell we even sometimes fork two dollars for that extra side guacamole at a restaurant, so why not pay for the music that serves, in most cases, as a soundtrack to your own life?

I don’t really want to be part of a world in which the only music we will listen to are the one made to support corporate advertising campaigns, video games or television programming. I do not want to listen to albums that get continuously interrupted by “sponsored content,“ and thus ruining our immersive listening experiences. It is certainly not how I intend the music I create to be heard.

To all of our regular listeners who have bought an album at a gig, at a record store, or directly through Bandcamp: Thank you for supporting this lifestyle choice, it is not an easy one, but it is sure fulfilling.

Let’s continue on this path, I can’t wait to see what comes next!

--

--