Am I missing something here, or why not just check a review of the game? I enjoyed a lot of the points and stats here, but there is that oversight. Obviously play style and ability vary between reviewer and reader, but after enough of them I get a sense of what it will mean for me when the reviewer says, “I got through it in 30 hours, with minimal-to-medium side questing”. It’s not hard to find this info in a review without reading spoilers (I know, because I hate spoilers), and if the specific issue is as mentioned — determining between a 3-hour (one sit-down) game, or something in the 20-plus hour range - that’s easy to find out. Plus, consistent enough gamers (the demographic here) know where to go for such reviews.