At the moment, this scoring methodology is less focused on pure tech KPIs and is geared more towards governance practices and community tools provided by BPs.
When measuring BP performance, there are many ways to skin the cat. Being able to run a sound technical operation is obviously important (and I look forward to seeing your work around a KPI system), however it is not my area of expertise — where I can add value is on the governance side.
As technical people, I see BPs sometimes focusing too much on the tech and not enough time giving non-technical people the information they need in a digestible format to make good voting decisions. The vast majority of tokenholders live at the surface-level in terms of their technical expertise and knowledge of EOS’ inner-workings.
Ultimately, tools to understand both tech and governance/value-add performance should be part of the voter toolkit.
