The differences between Object.freeze() vs Const in JavaScript

Bolaji Ayodeji
4 min readMay 13, 2019

--

ES6 has brought several new features and methods into JavaScript since its release. These features have better improved our workflow and productivity as JavaScript developers. Amongst these new features are Object.freeze() method and const.

It is argued among a few developers especially newbies that these two feature works the same way, but NO they don’t. Object.freeze() and const work differently. Let me show you how!

Overview

const and Object.freeze() are totally different.

  • const behaves like let. The only difference is, it defines a variable that cannot be reassigned. Variables declared by const are block scoped and not function scoped like variables declared with var
  • Object.freeze() takes an object as an argument and returns the same object as an immutable object. This implies that no properties of the object can be added, removed, or changed.

Mutable objects have properties that can be changed. Immutable objects have no properties that can be changed after the object is created.

Examples:

Const

const user = 'Bolaji Ayodeji'user = 'Joe Nash'

This would throw an Uncaught TypeError because we are trying to reassign the variable user which was declared with the const keyword. THIS IS NOT VALID.

Originally, this would work with var or let but will not with const

The problem with const

When working with Objects, using const only prevents reassignment and not immutability. (Ability to prevent changes to its properties)

Consider the code below. We have declared a variable using the const keyword and assigned an object named user to it.

const user = {
first_name: 'bolaji',
last_name: 'ayodeji',
email: 'hi@bolajiayodeji.com',
net_worth: 2000
}
user.last_name = 'Samson';
// this would work, user is still mutable!
user.net_worth = 983265975975950;
// this would work too, user is still mutable and getting rich :)!
console.log(user); // user is mutated

Although we can’t reassign to this variable called object, we can still mutate the object itself.

const user = {
user_name: 'bolajiayodeji'
}
// won't work

We definitely would want to have Objects with properties that cannot be modified or deleted. const cannot do this and this is where Object.freeze() saves the day :).

Behold Object.freeze()

To disable any changes to the object we need Object.freeze().

const user = {
first_name: 'bolaji',
last_name: 'ayodeji',
email: 'hi@bolajiayodeji.com',
net_worth: 2000
}
Object.freeze(user);user.last_name = 'Samson';
// this won't work, user is still immutable!
user.net_worth = 983265975975950;
// this won't work too, user is still immutable and still broke :(!
console.log(user); // user is immutated

Objects with nested properties are not actually frozen

Well, Object.freeze() is a bit shallow, you will need to apply it on nested objects to protect them recursively.

const user = {
first_name: 'bolaji',
last_name: 'ayodeji',
contact: {
email: 'hi@bolajiayodeji.com',
telephone: 08109445504,
}
}
Object.freeze(user);user.last_name = 'Samson';
// this won't work, user is still immutable!
user.contact.telephone = 07054394926;
// this will work because the nested object is not frozen
console.log(user);

So Object.freeze() doesn't fully freeze an object when it has properties which are nested.

To completely freeze objects and its nested properties, you can write your own library or use already created libraries like Deepfreeze or immutable-js

Conclusion

const and Object.freeze() are not the same, const prevents reassignment and Object.freeze() prevents mutability

PS: This article was first published on my blog here

Thanks for reading, Cheers!

--

--

Bolaji Ayodeji

Software Engineer, Content Creator, and Developer Advocate.